PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FTXSX vs. VRTGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FTXSX vs. VRTGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FullerThaler Behavioral Small-Cap Growth Fund (FTXSX) and Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares (VRTGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FTXSX achieves a 31.95% return, which is significantly higher than VRTGX's 17.44% return.


FTXSX

1D
-0.44%
1M
5.36%
YTD
31.95%
6M
30.49%
1Y
63.89%
3Y*
30.15%
5Y*
15.41%
10Y*

VRTGX

1D
-0.49%
1M
4.54%
YTD
17.44%
6M
18.06%
1Y
40.55%
3Y*
18.42%
5Y*
5.78%
10Y*
11.46%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FTXSX vs. VRTGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FTXSX
FullerThaler Behavioral Small-Cap Growth Fund
31.95%12.44%28.86%33.15%-27.48%25.50%51.32%19.19%-3.71%
VRTGX
Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares
17.44%12.97%15.26%18.80%-26.30%2.82%34.81%28.84%-12.61%

Correlation

The correlation between FTXSX and VRTGX is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.88

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 16, 2018

0.91

The correlation between FTXSX and VRTGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FTXSX vs. VRTGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FTXSX
FTXSX Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
FTXSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTXSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTXSX Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
FTXSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTXSX Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

VRTGX
VRTGX Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
VRTGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VRTGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
VRTGX Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
VRTGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
VRTGX Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FTXSX vs. VRTGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FullerThaler Behavioral Small-Cap Growth Fund (FTXSX) and Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares (VRTGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FTXSXVRTGXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.50

1.94

+0.56

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.06

2.66

+0.40

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.32

+0.08

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

5.19

2.76

+2.42

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

21.11

9.96

+11.15

FTXSX vs. VRTGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FTXSX Sharpe Ratio is 2.50, which is comparable to the VRTGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FTXSX and VRTGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FTXSXVRTGXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.50

1.94

+0.56

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

0.24

+0.34

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.47

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.66

0.51

+0.14

Drawdowns

FTXSX vs. VRTGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTXSX drawdown since its inception was -45.03%, which is greater than VRTGX's maximum drawdown of -41.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTXSX and VRTGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FTXSXVRTGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.03%

-41.97%

-3.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.37%

-14.80%

+2.43%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-32.37%

-28.54%

-3.83%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-39.58%

-40.48%

+0.90%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.57%

-0.87%

+0.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.48%

-10.44%

-2.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.04%

4.10%

-1.06%

Volatility

FTXSX vs. VRTGX - Volatility Comparison

FullerThaler Behavioral Small-Cap Growth Fund (FTXSX) has a higher volatility of 8.29% compared to Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares (VRTGX) at 6.44%. This indicates that FTXSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VRTGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FTXSXVRTGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.29%

6.44%

+1.85%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.41%

15.86%

+4.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.01%

21.40%

+4.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.72%

24.55%

+2.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.66%

24.51%

+3.15%

FTXSX vs. VRTGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FTXSX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than VRTGX's 0.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

FTXSX vs. VRTGX - Dividend Comparison

FTXSX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VRTGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.61%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FTXSX
FullerThaler Behavioral Small-Cap Growth Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%17.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VRTGX
Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares
0.61%0.57%0.62%0.85%0.78%0.54%0.53%0.90%0.85%0.75%1.07%0.84%

Frequently Asked Questions


FTXSX and VRTGX have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FTXSX has higher volatility (8.29%) compared to VRTGX (6.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTXSX dropped -45.03% vs VRTGX's -41.97%.

FTXSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.50 vs 1.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FTXSX and VRTGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer