FTXSX vs. NESGX

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

FTXSX (FullerThaler Behavioral Small-Cap Growth Fund) and NESGX (Needham Small Cap Growth Fund) are both Small Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, FTXSX returned 13.23%/yr vs 5.57%/yr for NESGX. Their correlation of 0.83 means they have usually moved in the same direction. FTXSX charges 1.00%/yr vs 1.85%/yr for NESGX.

Performance

FTXSX vs. NESGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FullerThaler Behavioral Small-Cap Growth Fund (FTXSX) and Needham Small Cap Growth Fund (NESGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FTXSX achieves a 23.82% return, which is significantly lower than NESGX's 55.46% return.

FTXSX

• 1D: -0.49%
• 1M: -7.94%
• 6M: 17.09%
• YTD: 23.82%
• 1Y: 46.62%
• 3Y*: 23.26%
• 5Y*: 13.23%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 16.82%

NESGX

• 1D: 1.73%
• 1M: -8.87%
• 6M: 38.32%
• YTD: 55.46%
• 1Y: 77.26%
• 3Y*: 24.51%
• 5Y*: 5.57%
• 10Y*: 17.79%
• ALL TIME*: 12.83%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
FTXSX FullerThaler Behavioral Small-Cap Growth Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
NESGX Needham Small Cap Growth Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

FTXSX vs. NESGX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
FTXSX FullerThaler Behavioral Small-Cap Growth Fund	23.82%	12.44%	28.86%	33.15%	-27.48%	25.50%	51.32%	19.19%	-3.71%
NESGX Needham Small Cap Growth Fund	55.46%	10.50%	12.76%	5.68%	-30.21%	10.59%	71.90%	54.42%	-8.23%

Correlation

The correlation between FTXSX and NESGX is 0.86, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.86
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.84
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.86
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 12, 2018	0.83

The correlation between FTXSX and NESGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FTXSX vs. NESGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FTXSX

FTXSX Risk / Return Rank: 59
FTXSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 52
FTXSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 46
FTXSX Omega Ratio Rank: 43
FTXSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 75
FTXSX Martin Ratio Rank: 79

NESGX

NESGX Risk / Return Rank: 82
NESGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
NESGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 75
NESGX Omega Ratio Rank: 72
NESGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
NESGX Martin Ratio Rank: 90

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FTXSX vs. NESGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FullerThaler Behavioral Small-Cap Growth Fund (FTXSX) and Needham Small Cap Growth Fund (NESGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FTXSX	NESGX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.49	2.14	-0.64
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.02	2.66	-0.64
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	1.33	-0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.56	3.31	-0.74
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.15	12.74	-2.59

FTXSX vs. NESGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FTXSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.49, which is lower than the NESGX Sharpe Ratio of 2.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FTXSX and NESGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FTXSX vs. NESGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTXSX drawdown since its inception was -45.03%, smaller than the maximum NESGX drawdown of -50.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTXSX and NESGX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FTXSX	NESGX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-45.03%	-50.29%	+5.26%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.36%	-22.14%	+4.78%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-32.37%	-35.27%	+2.90%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-39.58%	-50.05%	+10.47%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-50.29%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-13.61%	-16.68%	+3.07%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.35%	-11.64%	-0.71%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.38%	5.74%	-1.36%

Volatility

FTXSX vs. NESGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FullerThaler Behavioral Small-Cap Growth Fund (FTXSX) is 10.41%, while Needham Small Cap Growth Fund (NESGX) has a volatility of 13.44%. This indicates that FTXSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NESGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FTXSX	NESGX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.41%	13.44%	-3.03%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	24.48%	26.17%	-1.69%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	29.84%	34.33%	-4.49%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	27.38%	30.16%	-2.78%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	27.91%	26.40%	+1.51%

FTXSX vs. NESGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FTXSX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is lower than NESGX's 1.85% expense ratio.

Dividends

FTXSX vs. NESGX - Dividend Comparison

Neither FTXSX nor NESGX has paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FTXSX FullerThaler Behavioral Small-Cap Growth Fund	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	17.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
NESGX Needham Small Cap Growth Fund	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	4.16%	25.09%	13.69%	8.43%	22.26%	8.94%	6.67%	2.52%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FTXSX and NESGX in my portfolio?

FTXSX and NESGX have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FTXSX or NESGX?

NESGX has higher volatility (13.44%) compared to FTXSX (10.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTXSX dropped -45.03% vs NESGX's -50.29%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

NESGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.14 vs 1.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.