PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FTXL vs. EMXC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FTXL vs. EMXC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Nasdaq Semiconductor ETF (FTXL) and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF (EMXC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FTXL achieves a 108.47% return, which is significantly higher than EMXC's 37.25% return.


FTXL

1D
2.27%
1M
10.09%
YTD
108.47%
6M
110.95%
1Y
197.22%
3Y*
57.13%
5Y*
33.62%
10Y*

EMXC

1D
0.55%
1M
3.75%
YTD
37.25%
6M
42.23%
1Y
65.26%
3Y*
26.47%
5Y*
12.14%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FTXL vs. EMXC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FTXL
First Trust Nasdaq Semiconductor ETF
108.47%48.94%7.59%54.41%-33.88%36.04%46.08%61.77%-14.47%15.90%
EMXC
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF
37.25%35.14%2.68%18.96%-19.56%8.54%12.76%15.80%-12.96%7.16%

Correlation

The correlation between FTXL and EMXC is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.70

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.67

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 26, 2017

0.62

The correlation between FTXL and EMXC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.62 to 0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.

FTXL vs. EMXC - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FTXL
EMXC

Technology

99.5%
45.0%

Industrials

0.5%
8.3%

Basic Materials

-

6.8%

Communication Services

-

3.4%

Consumer Cyclical

-

4.5%

Consumer Defensive

-

2.9%

Energy

-

4.2%

Financial Services

-

19.6%

Healthcare

-

2.2%

Real Estate

-

1.0%

Utilities

-

2.3%

Technology

FTXL
99.5%
EMXC
45.0%

Industrials

FTXL
0.5%
EMXC
8.3%

Basic Materials

FTXL

-

EMXC
6.8%

Communication Services

FTXL

-

EMXC
3.4%

Consumer Cyclical

FTXL

-

EMXC
4.5%

Consumer Defensive

FTXL

-

EMXC
2.9%

Energy

FTXL

-

EMXC
4.2%

Financial Services

FTXL

-

EMXC
19.6%

Healthcare

FTXL

-

EMXC
2.2%

Real Estate

FTXL

-

EMXC
1.0%

Utilities

FTXL

-

EMXC
2.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FTXL vs. EMXC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FTXL
FTXL Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
FTXL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTXL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTXL Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
FTXL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTXL Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank

EMXC
EMXC Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
EMXC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMXC Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMXC Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
EMXC Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMXC Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FTXL vs. EMXC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Nasdaq Semiconductor ETF (FTXL) and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF (EMXC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FTXLEMXCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.36

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.41

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.66

1.50

+0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

13.68

4.55

+9.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

47.98

17.51

+30.47

FTXL vs. EMXC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FTXL Sharpe Ratio is 5.10, which is higher than the EMXC Sharpe Ratio of 2.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FTXL and EMXC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FTXL vs. EMXC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTXL drawdown since its inception was -43.87%, roughly equal to the maximum EMXC drawdown of -42.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTXL and EMXC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FTXLEMXCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.87%

-42.81%

-1.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.51%

-14.41%

-0.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-41.57%

-19.12%

-22.45%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.87%

-28.91%

-14.96%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.35%

-4.12%

+0.77%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.54%

-10.17%

-0.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.13%

3.74%

+0.39%

Volatility

FTXL vs. EMXC - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Nasdaq Semiconductor ETF (FTXL) has a higher volatility of 19.23% compared to iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF (EMXC) at 12.83%. This indicates that FTXL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EMXC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FTXLEMXCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

19.23%

12.83%

+6.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

32.79%

21.90%

+10.89%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

38.90%

23.90%

+15.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

36.63%

18.00%

+18.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

34.55%

20.07%

+14.48%

FTXL vs. EMXC - Expense Ratio Comparison

FTXL has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than EMXC's 0.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

FTXL vs. EMXC - Dividend Comparison

FTXL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.13%, less than EMXC's 2.05% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
EMXC
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF
2.05%2.82%2.69%1.83%2.85%1.78%1.45%3.25%2.63%0.99%0.00%
FTXL
First Trust Nasdaq Semiconductor ETF
0.13%0.28%0.54%0.60%0.89%0.25%0.48%0.92%0.71%0.47%0.12%

Frequently Asked Questions


FTXL and EMXC have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FTXL has higher volatility (19.23%) compared to EMXC (12.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTXL dropped -43.87% vs EMXC's -42.81%.

On 5-year performance, FTXL leads with 33.62% vs 12.14% for EMXC. On fees, EMXC is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, EMXC has been the lower-risk option at 12.83%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FTXL has performed better with a 33.62% return vs 12.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EMXC is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for FTXL.

EMXC has the higher dividend yield at 2.05%, compared with 0.13% for FTXL.

FTXL is categorized as Semiconductors, while EMXC is Emerging Markets Equities. FTXL tracks Nasdaq U.S. Smart Semiconductor Index, while EMXC tracks MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for FTXL and 0.49% for EMXC.

FTXL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.10 vs 2.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FTXL and EMXC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer