FTXH vs. SPAQ
FTXH (First Trust Nasdaq Pharmaceuticals ETF) and SPAQ (Horizon Kinetics SPAC Active ETF) are both Health & Biotech Equities funds. FTXH is passively managed, while SPAQ is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, FTXH returned 13.46%/yr vs 5.95%/yr for SPAQ. At a 0.04 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FTXH charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for SPAQ.
Performance
FTXH vs. SPAQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FTXH achieves a 11.84% return, which is significantly higher than SPAQ's 3.29% return.
FTXH
- 1D
- 1.27%
- 1M
- 5.47%
- YTD
- 11.84%
- 6M
- 9.84%
- 1Y
- 44.78%
- 3Y*
- 13.46%
- 5Y*
- 8.59%
- 10Y*
- —
SPAQ
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- 1.35%
- YTD
- 3.29%
- 6M
- 1.91%
- 1Y
- 3.62%
- 3Y*
- 5.95%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FTXH vs. SPAQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
FTXH First Trust Nasdaq Pharmaceuticals ETF | 11.84% | 24.15% | 2.98% | -2.02% |
SPAQ Horizon Kinetics SPAC Active ETF | 3.29% | 7.35% | 4.33% | 5.32% |
Correlation
The correlation between FTXH and SPAQ is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.01 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 30, 2023 | 0.04 |
FTXH vs. SPAQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FTXH
SPAQ
Healthcare
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Healthcare
FTXH
SPAQ
-
Basic Materials
FTXH
-
SPAQ
-
Communication Services
FTXH
-
SPAQ
-
Consumer Cyclical
FTXH
-
SPAQ
-
Consumer Defensive
FTXH
-
SPAQ
-
Energy
FTXH
-
SPAQ
-
Financial Services
FTXH
-
SPAQ
Industrials
FTXH
-
SPAQ
Real Estate
FTXH
-
SPAQ
-
Technology
FTXH
-
SPAQ
-
Utilities
FTXH
-
SPAQ
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FTXH vs. SPAQ — Risk / Return Rank
FTXH
SPAQ
FTXH vs. SPAQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Nasdaq Pharmaceuticals ETF (FTXH) and Horizon Kinetics SPAC Active ETF (SPAQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FTXH | SPAQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.19 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.19 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 1.10 | +0.34 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.02 | 0.79 | +5.23 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.73 | 2.79 | +14.94 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FTXH vs. SPAQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FTXH drawdown since its inception was -32.11%, which is greater than SPAQ's maximum drawdown of -5.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTXH and SPAQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FTXH | SPAQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.11% | -5.30% | -26.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.47% | -4.60% | -2.87% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.51% | -5.30% | -14.21% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.51% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.38% | +0.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.81% | -0.53% | -5.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.53% | 1.39% | +1.14% |
Volatility
FTXH vs. SPAQ - Volatility Comparison
First Trust Nasdaq Pharmaceuticals ETF (FTXH) has a higher volatility of 5.47% compared to Horizon Kinetics SPAC Active ETF (SPAQ) at 1.02%. This indicates that FTXH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPAQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FTXH | SPAQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.47% | 1.02% | +4.45% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.00% | 5.05% | +6.95% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.22% | 8.62% | +8.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.37% | 6.95% | +9.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.42% | 6.95% | +11.47% |
FTXH vs. SPAQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
FTXH has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than SPAQ's 0.85% expense ratio.
Dividends
FTXH vs. SPAQ - Dividend Comparison
FTXH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.15%, less than SPAQ's 16.16% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTXH First Trust Nasdaq Pharmaceuticals ETF | 1.15% | 1.41% | 1.66% | 1.55% | 1.11% | 1.03% | 0.82% | 0.67% | 0.91% | 2.18% | 0.19% |
SPAQ Horizon Kinetics SPAC Active ETF | 16.16% | 16.69% | 3.00% | 2.60% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FTXH and SPAQ have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FTXH has higher volatility (5.47%) compared to SPAQ (1.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTXH dropped -32.11% vs SPAQ's -5.30%.
On 3-year performance, FTXH leads with 13.46% vs 5.95% for SPAQ. On fees, FTXH is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, SPAQ has been the lower-risk option at 1.02%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, FTXH has performed better with a 13.46% return vs 5.95%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FTXH is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for SPAQ.
SPAQ has the higher dividend yield at 16.16%, compared with 1.15% for FTXH.
They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Horizon. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for FTXH and 0.85% for SPAQ.
FTXH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.62 vs 0.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FTXH and SPAQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer