FTXH vs. AGNG
FTXH (First Trust Nasdaq Pharmaceuticals ETF) and AGNG (Global X Aging Population ETF) are both Health & Biotech Equities funds - FTXH tracks the Nasdaq U.S. Smart Pharmaceuticals Index while AGNG tracks the Indxx Aging Population Thematic Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FTXH returned 8.33%/yr vs 4.39%/yr for AGNG. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FTXH charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for AGNG.
Performance
FTXH vs. AGNG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FTXH achieves a 7.62% return, which is significantly higher than AGNG's -2.82% return.
FTXH
- 1D
- 2.50%
- 1M
- 3.66%
- YTD
- 7.62%
- 6M
- 9.20%
- 1Y
- 39.54%
- 3Y*
- 12.33%
- 5Y*
- 8.33%
- 10Y*
- —
AGNG
- 1D
- 2.07%
- 1M
- -0.03%
- YTD
- -2.82%
- 6M
- -3.18%
- 1Y
- 11.38%
- 3Y*
- 8.98%
- 5Y*
- 4.39%
- 10Y*
- 8.91%
FTXH vs. AGNG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTXH First Trust Nasdaq Pharmaceuticals ETF | 7.62% | 24.15% | 2.98% | -1.41% | 2.55% | 6.14% | 11.73% | 22.13% | -9.51% | 19.44% |
AGNG Global X Aging Population ETF | -2.82% | 20.01% | 7.03% | 9.65% | -8.61% | 3.91% | 18.96% | 25.24% | -1.45% | 28.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between FTXH and AGNG is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 23, 2016 | 0.65 |
The correlation between FTXH and AGNG shifts across timeframes, from 0.65 (all time) to 0.80 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
FTXH vs. AGNG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FTXH
AGNG
Healthcare
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Healthcare
FTXH
AGNG
Basic Materials
FTXH
-
AGNG
-
Communication Services
FTXH
-
AGNG
-
Consumer Cyclical
FTXH
-
AGNG
-
Consumer Defensive
FTXH
-
AGNG
-
Energy
FTXH
-
AGNG
-
Financial Services
FTXH
-
AGNG
-
Industrials
FTXH
-
AGNG
-
Real Estate
FTXH
-
AGNG
Technology
FTXH
-
AGNG
-
Utilities
FTXH
-
AGNG
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FTXH vs. AGNG — Risk / Return Rank
FTXH
AGNG
FTXH vs. AGNG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Nasdaq Pharmaceuticals ETF (FTXH) and Global X Aging Population ETF (AGNG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FTXH | AGNG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.49 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.12 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.15 | +0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.32 | 1.00 | +4.32 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.35 | 2.69 | +12.66 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FTXH | AGNG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.32 | 0.83 | +1.49 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.51 | 0.29 | +0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.52 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.39 | 0.54 | -0.15 |
Drawdowns
FTXH vs. AGNG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FTXH drawdown since its inception was -32.11%, which is greater than AGNG's maximum drawdown of -30.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTXH and AGNG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FTXH | AGNG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.11% | -30.58% | -1.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.47% | -11.45% | +3.98% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.51% | -14.48% | -5.03% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.51% | -25.66% | +6.15% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -30.58% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.45% | -9.25% | +8.80% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.84% | -5.95% | +0.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.58% | 4.24% | -1.66% |
Volatility
FTXH vs. AGNG - Volatility Comparison
First Trust Nasdaq Pharmaceuticals ETF (FTXH) has a higher volatility of 5.38% compared to Global X Aging Population ETF (AGNG) at 4.43%. This indicates that FTXH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AGNG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FTXH | AGNG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.38% | 4.43% | +0.95% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.96% | 10.21% | +1.75% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.14% | 13.77% | +3.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.34% | 15.24% | +1.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.43% | 17.14% | +1.29% |
FTXH vs. AGNG - Expense Ratio Comparison
FTXH has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than AGNG's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
FTXH vs. AGNG - Dividend Comparison
FTXH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.19%, more than AGNG's 0.90% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AGNG Global X Aging Population ETF | 0.90% | 0.88% | 0.83% | 0.96% | 0.49% | 0.72% | 0.36% | 0.83% | 1.00% | 1.04% | 0.45% |
FTXH First Trust Nasdaq Pharmaceuticals ETF | 1.19% | 1.41% | 1.66% | 1.55% | 1.11% | 1.03% | 0.82% | 0.67% | 0.91% | 2.18% | 0.19% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FTXH and AGNG have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FTXH has higher volatility (5.38%) compared to AGNG (4.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTXH dropped -32.11% vs AGNG's -30.58%.
On 5-year performance, FTXH leads with 8.33% vs 4.39% for AGNG. On fees, AGNG is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, AGNG has been the lower-risk option at 4.43%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, FTXH has performed better with a 8.33% return vs 4.39%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
AGNG is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for FTXH.
FTXH has the higher dividend yield at 1.19%, compared with 0.90% for AGNG.
FTXH tracks Nasdaq U.S. Smart Pharmaceuticals Index, while AGNG tracks Indxx Aging Population Thematic Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for FTXH and 0.50% for AGNG.
FTXH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.32 vs 0.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FTXH and AGNG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer