FTWG.L vs. FWRA.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

FTWG.L (Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Dist) and FWRA.L (Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulation) are both Global Equities funds from Invesco tracking the FTSE All-World Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, FTWG.L returned 30.16% vs 30.18% for FWRA.L. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.15% expense ratio.

Performance

FTWG.L vs. FWRA.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Dist (FTWG.L) and Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulation (FWRA.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

FTWG.L is traded in GBp, while FWRA.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the FWRA.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with FTWG.L having a 11.87% return and FWRA.L slightly higher at 12.15%.

FTWG.L

• 1D: -0.03%
• 1M: 5.38%
• YTD: 11.87%
• 6M: 12.43%
• 1Y: 30.16%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FWRA.L

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 5.33%
• YTD: 12.15%
• 6M: 12.33%
• 1Y: 30.18%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FTWG.L vs. FWRA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
FTWG.L Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Dist	11.87%	14.12%	19.92%	7.22%
FWRA.L Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulation	12.04%	13.65%	20.13%	8.18%

Correlation

The correlation between FTWG.L and FWRA.L is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.89
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2023	0.89

The correlation between FTWG.L and FWRA.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

FTWG.L vs. FWRA.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FTWG.L	FWRA.L
Technology	29.1%	29.1%
Financial Services	16.4%	16.4%
Industrials	11.0%	11.0%
Consumer Cyclical	9.4%	9.4%
Communication Services	8.9%	8.9%
Healthcare	7.6%	7.6%
Consumer Defensive	5.0%	5.0%
Energy	4.3%	4.3%
Basic Materials	3.9%	3.9%
Utilities	2.6%	2.6%
Real Estate	1.9%	1.9%

Return for Risk

FTWG.L vs. FWRA.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FTWG.L

FTWG.L Risk / Return Rank: 86
FTWG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
FTWG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
FTWG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 89
FTWG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 81
FTWG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 84

FWRA.L

FWRA.L Risk / Return Rank: 73
FWRA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
FWRA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
FWRA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 73
FWRA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
FWRA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 74

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FTWG.L vs. FWRA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Dist (FTWG.L) and Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulation (FWRA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FTWG.L	FWRA.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.92	2.54	+0.38
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.01	3.52	+0.49
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.56	1.49	+0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.23	4.33	-0.10
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	17.22	16.50	+0.71
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FTWG.L vs. FWRA.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FTWG.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.92, which is comparable to the FWRA.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FTWG.L and FWRA.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FTWG.L	FWRA.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.92	2.54	+0.38
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.55	1.44	+0.10

Drawdowns

FTWG.L vs. FWRA.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTWG.L drawdown since its inception was -17.78%, roughly equal to the maximum FWRA.L drawdown of -17.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTWG.L and FWRA.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	FTWG.L	FWRA.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-17.78%	-17.86%	+0.08%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.11%	-6.91%	-0.20%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.42%	-0.38%	-0.04%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.99%	-2.09%	+0.10%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.75%	1.82%	-0.07%

Volatility

FTWG.L vs. FWRA.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Dist (FTWG.L) is 3.04%, while Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulation (FWRA.L) has a volatility of 3.67%. This indicates that FTWG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FWRA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FTWG.L	FWRA.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.04%	3.67%	-0.63%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.59%	9.28%	-1.69%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.28%	11.79%	-1.51%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.89%	12.93%	-1.04%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	11.89%	12.93%	-1.04%

FTWG.L vs. FWRA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both FTWG.L and FWRA.L have an expense ratio of 0.15%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

FTWG.L vs. FWRA.L - Dividend Comparison

FTWG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.22%, while FWRA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
FTWG.L Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Dist	1.22%	1.34%	1.50%	0.70%
FWRA.L Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulation	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FTWG.L and FWRA.L in my portfolio?

FTWG.L and FWRA.L have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, FTWG.L or FWRA.L?

Both ETFs have the same 0.15% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, FTWG.L or FWRA.L?

FTWG.L and FWRA.L have the same expense ratio: 0.15% per year.

What is the main difference between FTWG.L and FWRA.L?

Both ETFs track FTSE All-World Index.