PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FTWD.L vs. VRPS.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FTWD.L vs. VRPS.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF Dist (FTWD.L) and Invesco Variable Rate Preferred Shares UCITS ETF (VRPS.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FTWD.L achieves a 11.08% return, which is significantly higher than VRPS.L's 2.25% return.


FTWD.L

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.44%
6M
8.56%
YTD
11.08%
1Y
23.94%
3Y*
19.12%
5Y*
10Y*

VRPS.L

1D
0.05%
1M
0.18%
6M
1.64%
YTD
2.25%
1Y
5.42%
3Y*
8.46%
5Y*
3.53%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FTWD.L vs. VRPS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
FTWD.L
Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF Dist
11.08%22.55%17.90%10.03%
VRPS.L
Invesco Variable Rate Preferred Shares UCITS ETF
2.25%6.33%10.82%7.58%

Correlation

The correlation between FTWD.L and VRPS.L is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.48

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.41

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2023

0.41

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FTWD.L vs. VRPS.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FTWD.L
FTWD.L Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
FTWD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTWD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTWD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
FTWD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTWD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

VRPS.L
VRPS.L Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
VRPS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VRPS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
VRPS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
VRPS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
VRPS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FTWD.L vs. VRPS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF Dist (FTWD.L) and Invesco Variable Rate Preferred Shares UCITS ETF (VRPS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FTWD.LVRPS.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.46

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.74

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.31

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.75

2.55

+0.19

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.84

9.42

+1.42

FTWD.L vs. VRPS.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FTWD.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.85, which is higher than the VRPS.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FTWD.L and VRPS.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FTWD.L vs. VRPS.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTWD.L drawdown since its inception was -16.68%, smaller than the maximum VRPS.L drawdown of -34.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTWD.L and VRPS.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FTWD.LVRPS.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.68%

-34.22%

+17.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.72%

-2.11%

-6.61%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.68%

-3.45%

-13.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.23%

-0.23%

-1.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.91%

-3.22%

+1.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.21%

0.57%

+1.64%

Volatility

FTWD.L vs. VRPS.L - Volatility Comparison

Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF Dist (FTWD.L) has a higher volatility of 3.37% compared to Invesco Variable Rate Preferred Shares UCITS ETF (VRPS.L) at 0.68%. This indicates that FTWD.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VRPS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FTWD.LVRPS.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.37%

0.68%

+2.69%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.49%

2.82%

+7.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.94%

3.88%

+9.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.62%

5.34%

+8.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.62%

10.84%

+2.78%

FTWD.L vs. VRPS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

FTWD.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than VRPS.L's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

FTWD.L vs. VRPS.L - Dividend Comparison

FTWD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.25%, less than VRPS.L's 5.13% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
FTWD.L
Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF Dist
1.25%1.34%1.53%0.69%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VRPS.L
Invesco Variable Rate Preferred Shares UCITS ETF
5.13%4.99%4.98%4.97%4.60%3.72%3.97%4.33%0.70%

Frequently Asked Questions


FTWD.L and VRPS.L have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, FTWD.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FTWD.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for VRPS.L.

FTWD.L tracks FTSE All-World Index, while VRPS.L tracks Invesco Variable Rate Preferred Shares UCITS ETF. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for FTWD.L and 0.50% for VRPS.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FTWD.L and VRPS.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer