FTWD.L vs. VRPS.L
FTWD.L (Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF Dist) and VRPS.L (Invesco Variable Rate Preferred Shares UCITS ETF) are both Global Equities funds from Invesco - FTWD.L tracks the FTSE All-World Index while VRPS.L tracks the Invesco Variable Rate Preferred Shares UCITS ETF. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, FTWD.L returned 19.12%/yr vs 8.46%/yr for VRPS.L. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FTWD.L charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for VRPS.L.
Performance
FTWD.L vs. VRPS.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FTWD.L achieves a 11.08% return, which is significantly higher than VRPS.L's 2.25% return.
FTWD.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -0.44%
- 6M
- 8.56%
- YTD
- 11.08%
- 1Y
- 23.94%
- 3Y*
- 19.12%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VRPS.L
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- 0.18%
- 6M
- 1.64%
- YTD
- 2.25%
- 1Y
- 5.42%
- 3Y*
- 8.46%
- 5Y*
- 3.53%
- 10Y*
- —
FTWD.L vs. VRPS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
FTWD.L Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF Dist | 11.08% | 22.55% | 17.90% | 10.03% |
VRPS.L Invesco Variable Rate Preferred Shares UCITS ETF | 2.25% | 6.33% | 10.82% | 7.58% |
Correlation
The correlation between FTWD.L and VRPS.L is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2023 | 0.41 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FTWD.L vs. VRPS.L — Risk / Return Rank
FTWD.L
VRPS.L
FTWD.L vs. VRPS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF Dist (FTWD.L) and Invesco Variable Rate Preferred Shares UCITS ETF (VRPS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FTWD.L | VRPS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.46 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.74 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.31 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.75 | 2.55 | +0.19 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.84 | 9.42 | +1.42 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FTWD.L vs. VRPS.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FTWD.L drawdown since its inception was -16.68%, smaller than the maximum VRPS.L drawdown of -34.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTWD.L and VRPS.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FTWD.L | VRPS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.68% | -34.22% | +17.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.72% | -2.11% | -6.61% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.68% | -3.45% | -13.23% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -13.90% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.23% | -0.23% | -1.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.91% | -3.22% | +1.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.21% | 0.57% | +1.64% |
Volatility
FTWD.L vs. VRPS.L - Volatility Comparison
Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF Dist (FTWD.L) has a higher volatility of 3.37% compared to Invesco Variable Rate Preferred Shares UCITS ETF (VRPS.L) at 0.68%. This indicates that FTWD.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VRPS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FTWD.L | VRPS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.37% | 0.68% | +2.69% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.49% | 2.82% | +7.67% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.94% | 3.88% | +9.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.62% | 5.34% | +8.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.62% | 10.84% | +2.78% |
FTWD.L vs. VRPS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
FTWD.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than VRPS.L's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
FTWD.L vs. VRPS.L - Dividend Comparison
FTWD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.25%, less than VRPS.L's 5.13% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTWD.L Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF Dist | 1.25% | 1.34% | 1.53% | 0.69% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VRPS.L Invesco Variable Rate Preferred Shares UCITS ETF | 5.13% | 4.99% | 4.98% | 4.97% | 4.60% | 3.72% | 3.97% | 4.33% | 0.70% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FTWD.L and VRPS.L have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FTWD.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FTWD.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for VRPS.L.
FTWD.L tracks FTSE All-World Index, while VRPS.L tracks Invesco Variable Rate Preferred Shares UCITS ETF. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for FTWD.L and 0.50% for VRPS.L.
Find the right allocation for FTWD.L and VRPS.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer