FTWD.L vs. VPAC.L
FTWD.L (Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF Dist) and VPAC.L (Invesco Variable Rate Preferred Shares UCITS ETF USD) are both Global Equities funds from Invesco - FTWD.L tracks the FTSE All-World Index while VPAC.L tracks the Invesco Variable Rate Preferred Shares UCITS ETF USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, FTWD.L returned 19.12%/yr vs 8.42%/yr for VPAC.L. At a 0.45 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FTWD.L charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for VPAC.L.
Performance
FTWD.L vs. VPAC.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FTWD.L achieves a 11.08% return, which is significantly higher than VPAC.L's 2.04% return.
FTWD.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -0.44%
- 6M
- 8.56%
- YTD
- 11.08%
- 1Y
- 23.94%
- 3Y*
- 19.12%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VPAC.L
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- 0.07%
- 6M
- 1.59%
- YTD
- 2.04%
- 1Y
- 5.21%
- 3Y*
- 8.42%
- 5Y*
- 3.51%
- 10Y*
- —
FTWD.L vs. VPAC.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
FTWD.L Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF Dist | 11.08% | 22.55% | 17.90% | 10.03% |
VPAC.L Invesco Variable Rate Preferred Shares UCITS ETF USD | 2.04% | 6.34% | 10.84% | 7.60% |
Correlation
The correlation between FTWD.L and VPAC.L is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2023 | 0.45 |
The correlation between FTWD.L and VPAC.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.45 to 0.55 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FTWD.L vs. VPAC.L — Risk / Return Rank
FTWD.L
VPAC.L
FTWD.L vs. VPAC.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF Dist (FTWD.L) and Invesco Variable Rate Preferred Shares UCITS ETF USD (VPAC.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FTWD.L | VPAC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.22 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.37 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.32 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.75 | 2.54 | +0.20 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.84 | 9.98 | +0.85 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FTWD.L vs. VPAC.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FTWD.L drawdown since its inception was -16.68%, smaller than the maximum VPAC.L drawdown of -34.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTWD.L and VPAC.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FTWD.L | VPAC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.68% | -34.25% | +17.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.72% | -2.02% | -6.70% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.68% | -3.40% | -13.28% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -13.89% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.23% | -0.33% | -0.90% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.91% | -3.14% | +1.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.21% | 0.52% | +1.69% |
Volatility
FTWD.L vs. VPAC.L - Volatility Comparison
Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF Dist (FTWD.L) has a higher volatility of 3.37% compared to Invesco Variable Rate Preferred Shares UCITS ETF USD (VPAC.L) at 0.74%. This indicates that FTWD.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VPAC.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FTWD.L | VPAC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.37% | 0.74% | +2.63% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.49% | 2.28% | +8.21% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.94% | 3.17% | +9.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.62% | 5.30% | +8.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.62% | 11.00% | +2.62% |
FTWD.L vs. VPAC.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
FTWD.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than VPAC.L's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
FTWD.L vs. VPAC.L - Dividend Comparison
FTWD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.25%, while VPAC.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
FTWD.L Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF Dist | 1.25% | 1.34% | 1.53% | 0.69% |
VPAC.L Invesco Variable Rate Preferred Shares UCITS ETF USD | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FTWD.L and VPAC.L have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FTWD.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FTWD.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for VPAC.L.
FTWD.L tracks FTSE All-World Index, while VPAC.L tracks Invesco Variable Rate Preferred Shares UCITS ETF USD. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for FTWD.L and 0.50% for VPAC.L.
Find the right allocation for FTWD.L and VPAC.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer