FTWD.L vs. SMT.L
FTWD.L (Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF Dist) and SMT.L (Scottish Mortgage Investment Trust plc) are both Global Equities funds. FTWD.L is passively managed, while SMT.L is actively managed. Over the past year, FTWD.L returned 29.73% vs 54.97% for SMT.L. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FTWD.L charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.31%/yr for SMT.L.
Performance
FTWD.L vs. SMT.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
FTWD.L is traded in USD, while SMT.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the SMT.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FTWD.L achieves a 11.83% return, which is significantly lower than SMT.L's 29.00% return.
FTWD.L
- 1D
- -0.56%
- 1M
- 4.59%
- YTD
- 11.83%
- 6M
- 13.61%
- 1Y
- 29.73%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SMT.L
- 1D
- -1.01%
- 1M
- 6.48%
- YTD
- 29.00%
- 6M
- 45.11%
- 1Y
- 54.97%
- 3Y*
- 33.84%
- 5Y*
- 3.89%
- 10Y*
- 19.14%
FTWD.L vs. SMT.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
FTWD.L Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF Dist | 11.83% | 22.55% | 17.90% | 8.37% |
SMT.L Scottish Mortgage Investment Trust plc | 29.00% | 34.13% | 16.77% | 22.78% |
Correlation
The correlation between FTWD.L and SMT.L is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2023 | 0.75 |
The correlation between FTWD.L and SMT.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FTWD.L vs. SMT.L — Risk / Return Rank
FTWD.L
SMT.L
FTWD.L vs. SMT.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF Dist (FTWD.L) and Scottish Mortgage Investment Trust plc (SMT.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FTWD.L | SMT.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.11 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.18 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.45 | 1.44 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.40 | 4.24 | -0.84 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.20 | 13.45 | +0.75 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FTWD.L | SMT.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.41 | 2.52 | -0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.12 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.63 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.54 | 0.45 | +1.10 |
Drawdowns
FTWD.L vs. SMT.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FTWD.L drawdown since its inception was -16.68%, smaller than the maximum SMT.L drawdown of -71.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTWD.L and SMT.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FTWD.L | SMT.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.68% | -71.48% | +54.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.72% | -12.91% | +4.19% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -27.46% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -63.16% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -63.16% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.56% | -1.01% | +0.45% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.92% | -19.96% | +18.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.09% | 4.07% | -1.98% |
Volatility
FTWD.L vs. SMT.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF Dist (FTWD.L) is 3.94%, while Scottish Mortgage Investment Trust plc (SMT.L) has a volatility of 4.84%. This indicates that FTWD.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMT.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FTWD.L | SMT.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.94% | 4.84% | -0.90% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.63% | 17.46% | -7.83% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.31% | 21.74% | -9.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.62% | 31.76% | -18.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.62% | 30.38% | -16.76% |
FTWD.L vs. SMT.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
FTWD.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than SMT.L's 0.31% expense ratio.
Dividends
FTWD.L vs. SMT.L - Dividend Comparison
FTWD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.22%, more than SMT.L's 0.29% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTWD.L Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF Dist | 1.22% | 1.34% | 1.53% | 0.69% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SMT.L Scottish Mortgage Investment Trust plc | 0.29% | 0.37% | 0.44% | 0.51% | 0.51% | 0.26% | 0.27% | 0.54% | 0.66% | 0.67% | 0.93% | 1.05% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FTWD.L and SMT.L have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FTWD.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FTWD.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.31% for SMT.L.
They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Baillie Gifford Funds. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for FTWD.L and 0.31% for SMT.L.
Find the right allocation for FTWD.L and SMT.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer