PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FTWD.L vs. SASU.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FTWD.L vs. SASU.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF Dist (FTWD.L) and iShares MSCI USA Screened UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SASU.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FTWD.L achieves a 11.08% return, which is significantly higher than SASU.L's 9.97% return.


FTWD.L

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.44%
6M
8.56%
YTD
11.08%
1Y
23.94%
3Y*
19.12%
5Y*
10Y*

SASU.L

1D
0.00%
1M
0.45%
6M
9.06%
YTD
9.97%
1Y
23.20%
3Y*
20.83%
5Y*
13.16%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FTWD.L vs. SASU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
FTWD.L
Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF Dist
11.08%22.55%17.90%10.03%
SASU.L
iShares MSCI USA Screened UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
9.97%17.83%26.90%12.16%

Correlation

The correlation between FTWD.L and SASU.L is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2023

0.93

The correlation between FTWD.L and SASU.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FTWD.L vs. SASU.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FTWD.L
FTWD.L Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
FTWD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTWD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTWD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
FTWD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTWD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

SASU.L
SASU.L Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
SASU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SASU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
SASU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
SASU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
SASU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FTWD.L vs. SASU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF Dist (FTWD.L) and iShares MSCI USA Screened UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SASU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FTWD.LSASU.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.32

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.75

2.42

+0.32

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.84

9.65

+1.19

FTWD.L vs. SASU.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FTWD.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.85, which is comparable to the SASU.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FTWD.L and SASU.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FTWD.L vs. SASU.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTWD.L drawdown since its inception was -16.68%, smaller than the maximum SASU.L drawdown of -34.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTWD.L and SASU.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FTWD.LSASU.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.68%

-34.07%

+17.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.72%

-9.53%

+0.81%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.68%

-19.83%

+3.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.23%

-0.69%

-0.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.91%

-5.40%

+3.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.21%

2.40%

-0.19%

Volatility

FTWD.L vs. SASU.L - Volatility Comparison

Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF Dist (FTWD.L) has a higher volatility of 3.37% compared to iShares MSCI USA Screened UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SASU.L) at 3.04%. This indicates that FTWD.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SASU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FTWD.LSASU.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.37%

3.04%

+0.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.49%

10.09%

+0.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.94%

13.09%

-0.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.62%

17.03%

-3.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.62%

18.39%

-4.77%

FTWD.L vs. SASU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

FTWD.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than SASU.L's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FTWD.L vs. SASU.L - Dividend Comparison

FTWD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.25%, while SASU.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023
FTWD.L
Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF Dist
1.25%1.34%1.53%0.69%
SASU.L
iShares MSCI USA Screened UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, FTWD.L and SASU.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, SASU.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SASU.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for FTWD.L.

FTWD.L tracks FTSE All-World Index, while SASU.L tracks iShares MSCI USA Screened UCITS ETF USD (Acc). They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for FTWD.L and 0.07% for SASU.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FTWD.L and SASU.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer