FTWD.L vs. INFR.L

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FTWD.L (Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF Dist) and INFR.L (iShares Global Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD (Dist)) are both exchange-traded funds - FTWD.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the FTSE All-World Index, while INFR.L is a Utilities Equities fund tracking the FTSE Global Core Infrastructure Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, FTWD.L returned 29.73% vs 16.75% for INFR.L. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FTWD.L charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for INFR.L.

Performance

FTWD.L vs. INFR.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF Dist (FTWD.L) and iShares Global Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (INFR.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

FTWD.L is traded in USD, while INFR.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the INFR.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FTWD.L achieves a 11.83% return, which is significantly higher than INFR.L's 10.64% return.

FTWD.L

• 1D: -0.56%
• 1M: 4.59%
• YTD: 11.83%
• 6M: 13.61%
• 1Y: 29.73%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

INFR.L

• 1D: 1.09%
• 1M: -1.98%
• YTD: 10.64%
• 6M: 10.67%
• 1Y: 16.75%
• 3Y*: 12.81%
• 5Y*: 6.75%
• 10Y*: 8.08%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FTWD.L vs. INFR.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
FTWD.L Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF Dist	11.83%	22.55%	17.90%	8.37%
INFR.L iShares Global Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD (Dist)	10.64%	13.90%	9.63%	3.06%

Correlation

The correlation between FTWD.L and INFR.L is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.11
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2023	0.30

The correlation between FTWD.L and INFR.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.11 (1 year) to 0.30 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

FTWD.L vs. INFR.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FTWD.L

FTWD.L Risk / Return Rank: 74
FTWD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 74
FTWD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
FTWD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 75
FTWD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
FTWD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 75

INFR.L

INFR.L Risk / Return Rank: 53
INFR.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 49
INFR.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 49
INFR.L Omega Ratio Rank: 46
INFR.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
INFR.L Martin Ratio Rank: 52

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FTWD.L vs. INFR.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF Dist (FTWD.L) and iShares Global Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (INFR.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FTWD.L	INFR.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.41	1.59	+0.81
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.52	2.27	+1.25
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.45	1.28	+0.16
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.40	3.25	+0.14
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.20	9.29	+4.92
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FTWD.L vs. INFR.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FTWD.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.41, which is higher than the INFR.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FTWD.L and INFR.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FTWD.L	INFR.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.41	1.59	+0.81
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.49	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.55	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.54	0.32	+1.22

Drawdowns

FTWD.L vs. INFR.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTWD.L drawdown since its inception was -16.68%, smaller than the maximum INFR.L drawdown of -48.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTWD.L and INFR.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	FTWD.L	INFR.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-16.68%	-48.40%	+31.72%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.72%	-5.13%	-3.59%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-14.58%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-21.88%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-34.60%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.56%	-2.46%	+1.90%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.92%	-9.56%	+7.64%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.09%	1.80%	+0.29%

Volatility

FTWD.L vs. INFR.L - Volatility Comparison

Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF Dist (FTWD.L) has a higher volatility of 3.94% compared to iShares Global Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (INFR.L) at 3.49%. This indicates that FTWD.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than INFR.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FTWD.L	INFR.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.94%	3.49%	+0.45%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.63%	8.65%	+0.98%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.31%	10.46%	+1.85%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.62%	13.70%	-0.08%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.62%	14.79%	-1.17%

FTWD.L vs. INFR.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

FTWD.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than INFR.L's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

FTWD.L vs. INFR.L - Dividend Comparison

FTWD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.22%, less than INFR.L's 2.78% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FTWD.L Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF Dist	1.22%	1.34%	1.53%	0.69%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
INFR.L iShares Global Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD (Dist)	2.78%	2.97%	2.96%	3.02%	2.54%	2.60%	2.84%	2.70%	2.99%	3.51%	3.45%	4.75%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FTWD.L and INFR.L in my portfolio?

FTWD.L and INFR.L have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, FTWD.L or INFR.L?

On fees, FTWD.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, FTWD.L or INFR.L?

FTWD.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for INFR.L.

What is the main difference between FTWD.L and INFR.L?

FTWD.L is categorized as Global Equities, while INFR.L is Utilities Equities. FTWD.L tracks FTSE All-World Index, while INFR.L tracks FTSE Global Core Infrastructure Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for FTWD.L and 0.65% for INFR.L.