PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FTWD.DE vs. F50A.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FTWD.DE vs. F50A.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Distribution (FTWD.DE) and Amundi Prime Global UCITS ETF Accumulating (F50A.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FTWD.DE achieves a 14.08% return, which is significantly higher than F50A.DE's 12.09% return.


FTWD.DE

1D
0.52%
1M
0.92%
6M
14.25%
YTD
14.08%
1Y
26.51%
3Y*
17.83%
5Y*
10Y*

F50A.DE

1D
0.00%
1M
1.12%
6M
12.69%
YTD
12.09%
1Y
24.10%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FTWD.DE vs. F50A.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
FTWD.DE
Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Distribution
14.08%9.08%-1.37%
F50A.DE
Amundi Prime Global UCITS ETF Accumulating
12.09%8.58%-1.22%

Correlation

The correlation between FTWD.DE and F50A.DE is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 25, 2024

0.95

The correlation between FTWD.DE and F50A.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FTWD.DE vs. F50A.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FTWD.DE
FTWD.DE Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
FTWD.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTWD.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTWD.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
FTWD.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTWD.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

F50A.DE
F50A.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
F50A.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
F50A.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
F50A.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
F50A.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
F50A.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FTWD.DE vs. F50A.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Distribution (FTWD.DE) and Amundi Prime Global UCITS ETF Accumulating (F50A.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FTWD.DEF50A.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.24

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.51

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.35

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.07

1.47

+2.60

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.12

2.61

+13.51

FTWD.DE vs. F50A.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FTWD.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.23, which is higher than the F50A.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FTWD.DE and F50A.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FTWD.DE vs. F50A.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTWD.DE drawdown since its inception was -21.01%, roughly equal to the maximum F50A.DE drawdown of -21.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTWD.DE and F50A.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FTWD.DEF50A.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.01%

-21.49%

+0.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.49%

-16.39%

+9.90%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.13%

-2.28%

+2.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.16%

-7.44%

+4.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.64%

9.23%

-7.59%

Volatility

FTWD.DE vs. F50A.DE - Volatility Comparison

Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Distribution (FTWD.DE) has a higher volatility of 3.62% compared to Amundi Prime Global UCITS ETF Accumulating (F50A.DE) at 3.24%. This indicates that FTWD.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than F50A.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FTWD.DEF50A.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.62%

3.24%

+0.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.60%

8.31%

+0.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.89%

24.40%

-12.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.70%

22.54%

-8.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.70%

22.54%

-8.84%

FTWD.DE vs. F50A.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

FTWD.DE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than F50A.DE's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FTWD.DE vs. F50A.DE - Dividend Comparison

FTWD.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.23%, while F50A.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023
F50A.DE
Amundi Prime Global UCITS ETF Accumulating
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FTWD.DE
Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Distribution
1.23%1.36%1.49%0.70%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, FTWD.DE and F50A.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, F50A.DE is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

F50A.DE is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for FTWD.DE.

FTWD.DE tracks FTSE All-World Index, while F50A.DE tracks Solactive GBS Developed Markets Large & Mid Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for FTWD.DE and 0.05% for F50A.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FTWD.DE and F50A.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer