FTU.TO vs. XEQT.TO
FTU.TO (US Financial 15 Split Corp) is a stock, while XEQT.TO (iShares Core Equity ETF Portfolio) is Global Equities fund actively managed by iShares. At a correlation of -0.09, they often move in opposite directions.
Performance
FTU.TO vs. XEQT.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FTU.TO achieves a -10.34% return, which is significantly lower than XEQT.TO's 10.25% return.
FTU.TO
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -13.33%
- YTD
- -10.34%
- 6M
- -0.00%
- 1Y
- 15.56%
- 3Y*
- 45.16%
- 5Y*
- 8.18%
- 10Y*
- 4.75%
XEQT.TO
- 1D
- -2.62%
- 1M
- 1.43%
- YTD
- 10.25%
- 6M
- 9.51%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FTU.TO vs. XEQT.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
FTU.TO US Financial 15 Split Corp | -10.34% | 28.89% |
XEQT.TO iShares Core Equity ETF Portfolio | 10.25% | 14.62% |
Correlation
The correlation between FTU.TO and XEQT.TO is -0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 9, 2025 | -0.09 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FTU.TO vs. XEQT.TO — Risk / Return Rank
FTU.TO
XEQT.TO
FTU.TO vs. XEQT.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for US Financial 15 Split Corp (FTU.TO) and iShares Core Equity ETF Portfolio (XEQT.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FTU.TO | XEQT.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.34 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.82 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FTU.TO | XEQT.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.19 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.09 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.05 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.16 | 2.23 | -2.38 |
Drawdowns
FTU.TO vs. XEQT.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FTU.TO drawdown since its inception was -99.63%, which is greater than XEQT.TO's maximum drawdown of -8.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTU.TO and XEQT.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FTU.TO | XEQT.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.63% | -8.25% | -91.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -45.65% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -48.57% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -73.50% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -94.32% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -97.76% | -2.62% | -95.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -94.51% | -1.04% | -93.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 19.07% | — | — |
Volatility
FTU.TO vs. XEQT.TO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FTU.TO | XEQT.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.34% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 58.08% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 83.50% | 11.98% | +71.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 94.04% | 11.98% | +82.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 99.89% | 11.98% | +87.91% |
Dividends
FTU.TO vs. XEQT.TO - Dividend Comparison
FTU.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XEQT.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.51%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTU.TO US Financial 15 Split Corp | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 15.99% | 40.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 25.65% |
XEQT.TO iShares Core Equity ETF Portfolio | 1.51% | 1.66% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FTU.TO and XEQT.TO have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for FTU.TO and XEQT.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer