PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FTU.TO vs. XEQT.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FTU.TO vs. XEQT.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in US Financial 15 Split Corp (FTU.TO) and iShares Core Equity ETF Portfolio (XEQT.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FTU.TO achieves a -10.34% return, which is significantly lower than XEQT.TO's 10.25% return.


FTU.TO

1D
0.00%
1M
-13.33%
YTD
-10.34%
6M
-0.00%
1Y
15.56%
3Y*
45.16%
5Y*
8.18%
10Y*
4.75%

XEQT.TO

1D
-2.62%
1M
1.43%
YTD
10.25%
6M
9.51%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FTU.TO vs. XEQT.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
FTU.TO
US Financial 15 Split Corp
-10.34%28.89%
XEQT.TO
iShares Core Equity ETF Portfolio
10.25%14.62%

Correlation

The correlation between FTU.TO and XEQT.TO is -0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 9, 2025

-0.09

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FTU.TO vs. XEQT.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FTU.TO
FTU.TO Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
FTU.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTU.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTU.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
FTU.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTU.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

XEQT.TO
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FTU.TO vs. XEQT.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for US Financial 15 Split Corp (FTU.TO) and iShares Core Equity ETF Portfolio (XEQT.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FTU.TOXEQT.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.34

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.82

FTU.TO vs. XEQT.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FTU.TOXEQT.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.19

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.09

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.16

2.23

-2.38

Drawdowns

FTU.TO vs. XEQT.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTU.TO drawdown since its inception was -99.63%, which is greater than XEQT.TO's maximum drawdown of -8.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTU.TO and XEQT.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FTU.TOXEQT.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.63%

-8.25%

-91.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-45.65%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-48.57%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-73.50%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-94.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-97.76%

-2.62%

-95.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-94.51%

-1.04%

-93.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

19.07%

Volatility

FTU.TO vs. XEQT.TO - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FTU.TOXEQT.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

58.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

83.50%

11.98%

+71.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

94.04%

11.98%

+82.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

99.89%

11.98%

+87.91%

Dividends

FTU.TO vs. XEQT.TO - Dividend Comparison

FTU.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XEQT.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.51%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
FTU.TO
US Financial 15 Split Corp
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%15.99%40.00%0.00%0.00%25.65%
XEQT.TO
iShares Core Equity ETF Portfolio
1.51%1.66%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FTU.TO and XEQT.TO have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FTU.TO and XEQT.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer