FTSM vs. FUSI
FTSM (First Trust Enhanced Short Maturity ETF) and FUSI (American Century Multisector Floating Income ETF) are both Ultrashort Bond funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, FTSM returned 4.86%/yr vs 5.99%/yr for FUSI. At a 0.29 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FTSM charges 0.44%/yr vs 0.28%/yr for FUSI.
Performance
FTSM vs. FUSI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FTSM achieves a 1.49% return, which is significantly lower than FUSI's 2.52% return.
FTSM
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- 0.37%
- YTD
- 1.49%
- 6M
- 1.84%
- 1Y
- 4.15%
- 3Y*
- 4.86%
- 5Y*
- 3.46%
- 10Y*
- 2.55%
FUSI
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- 0.84%
- YTD
- 2.52%
- 6M
- 2.92%
- 1Y
- 5.54%
- 3Y*
- 5.99%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FTSM vs. FUSI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
FTSM First Trust Enhanced Short Maturity ETF | 1.49% | 4.66% | 5.22% | 4.17% |
FUSI American Century Multisector Floating Income ETF | 2.52% | 4.85% | 6.19% | 5.89% |
Correlation
The correlation between FTSM and FUSI is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 17, 2023 | 0.29 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FTSM vs. FUSI — Risk / Return Rank
FTSM
FUSI
FTSM vs. FUSI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Enhanced Short Maturity ETF (FTSM) and American Century Multisector Floating Income ETF (FUSI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FTSM | FUSI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.64 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +11.14 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 4.37 | 3.03 | +1.34 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 35.72 | 12.50 | +23.22 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 178.37 | 92.85 | +85.52 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FTSM | FUSI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.77 | 6.14 | +2.64 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 7.04 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 2.91 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.96 | 5.60 | -3.64 |
Drawdowns
FTSM vs. FUSI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FTSM drawdown since its inception was -4.12%, which is greater than FUSI's maximum drawdown of -0.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTSM and FUSI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FTSM | FUSI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -4.12% | -0.70% | -3.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.12% | -0.45% | +0.33% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -0.15% | -0.70% | +0.55% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -0.65% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -4.12% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.22% | -0.04% | -0.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.02% | 0.06% | -0.04% |
Volatility
FTSM vs. FUSI - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for First Trust Enhanced Short Maturity ETF (FTSM) is 0.16%, while American Century Multisector Floating Income ETF (FUSI) has a volatility of 0.27%. This indicates that FTSM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FUSI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FTSM | FUSI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.16% | 0.27% | -0.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.35% | 0.62% | -0.27% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.48% | 0.91% | -0.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.49% | 1.09% | -0.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.88% | 1.09% | -0.21% |
FTSM vs. FUSI - Expense Ratio Comparison
FTSM has a 0.44% expense ratio, which is higher than FUSI's 0.28% expense ratio.
Dividends
FTSM vs. FUSI - Dividend Comparison
FTSM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.16%, less than FUSI's 5.25% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTSM First Trust Enhanced Short Maturity ETF | 4.16% | 4.28% | 4.91% | 4.62% | 1.62% | 0.39% | 1.20% | 2.38% | 2.14% | 1.49% | 1.03% | 0.48% |
FUSI American Century Multisector Floating Income ETF | 5.25% | 5.28% | 5.98% | 4.97% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FTSM and FUSI have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FUSI has higher volatility (0.27%) compared to FTSM (0.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTSM dropped -4.12% vs FUSI's -0.70%.
On 3-year performance, FUSI leads with 5.99% vs 4.86% for FTSM. On fees, FUSI is cheaper at 0.28% per year. On volatility, FTSM has been the lower-risk option at 0.16%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, FUSI has performed better with a 5.99% return vs 4.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FUSI is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.44% for FTSM.
FUSI has the higher dividend yield at 5.25%, compared with 4.16% for FTSM.
They also come from different issuers: First Trust and American Century. Their fees differ too: 0.44% for FTSM and 0.28% for FUSI.
FTSM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (8.77 vs 6.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FTSM and FUSI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer