FTSM vs. EPR

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about First Trust Enhanced Short Maturity ETF (FTSM) and EPR Properties (EPR).

FTSM is an actively managed fund by First Trust. It was launched on Aug 5, 2014.

Performance

FTSM vs. EPR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Enhanced Short Maturity ETF (FTSM) and EPR Properties (EPR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

FTSM vs. EPR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FTSM First Trust Enhanced Short Maturity ETF	0.76%	4.66%	5.22%	5.12%	1.02%	-0.01%	1.12%	2.82%	1.94%	1.57%
EPR EPR Properties	1.80%	20.52%	-1.25%	38.83%	-14.61%	50.60%	-52.09%	17.13%	3.59%	-3.41%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FTSM achieves a 0.76% return, which is significantly lower than EPR's 1.80% return. Over the past 10 years, FTSM has underperformed EPR with an annualized return of 2.50%, while EPR has yielded a comparatively higher 3.25% annualized return.

FTSM

• 1D: 0.07%
• 1M: 0.08%
• YTD: 0.76%
• 6M: 1.82%
• 1Y: 4.19%
• 3Y*: 4.86%
• 5Y*: 3.33%
• 10Y*: 2.50%

EPR

• 1D: 2.00%
• 1M: -15.37%
• YTD: 1.80%
• 6M: -10.88%
• 1Y: 1.49%
• 3Y*: 17.71%
• 5Y*: 7.86%
• 10Y*: 3.25%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

FTSM vs. EPR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FTSM

FTSM Risk / Return Rank: 99
FTSM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
FTSM Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
FTSM Omega Ratio Rank: 99
FTSM Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
FTSM Martin Ratio Rank: 99

EPR

EPR Risk / Return Rank: 42
EPR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
EPR Sortino Ratio Rank: 37
EPR Omega Ratio Rank: 37
EPR Calmar Ratio Rank: 47
EPR Martin Ratio Rank: 47

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FTSM vs. EPR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Enhanced Short Maturity ETF (FTSM) and EPR Properties (EPR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FTSM	EPR	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	8.29	0.06	+8.23
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	17.39	0.26	+17.13
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	3.96	1.03	+2.92
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	28.25	0.20	+28.05
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	139.10	0.40	+138.70
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FTSM vs. EPR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FTSM Sharpe Ratio is 8.29, which is higher than the EPR Sharpe Ratio of 0.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FTSM and EPR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FTSM	EPR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.29	0.06	+8.23
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	6.86	0.29	+6.57
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	2.84	0.08	+2.76
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.92	0.29	+1.64

Correlation

The correlation between FTSM and EPR is 0.04, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

FTSM vs. EPR - Dividend Comparison

FTSM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.22%, less than EPR's 7.12% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FTSM First Trust Enhanced Short Maturity ETF	4.22%	4.28%	4.91%	4.62%	1.62%	0.39%	1.20%	2.38%	2.14%	1.49%	1.03%	0.48%
EPR EPR Properties	7.12%	7.05%	7.68%	6.81%	8.62%	3.16%	4.66%	6.37%	5.62%	6.23%	5.35%	6.21%

Drawdowns

FTSM vs. EPR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTSM drawdown since its inception was -4.12%, smaller than the maximum EPR drawdown of -82.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTSM and EPR.

Drawdown Indicators

	FTSM	EPR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-4.12%	-82.02%	+77.90%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-0.15%	-19.51%	+19.36%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-0.65%	-35.63%	+34.98%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-4.12%	-82.02%	+77.90%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-16.92%	+16.92%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.22%	-16.66%	+16.44%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.03%	9.66%	-9.63%

Volatility

FTSM vs. EPR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Enhanced Short Maturity ETF (FTSM) is 0.19%, while EPR Properties (EPR) has a volatility of 8.43%. This indicates that FTSM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EPR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FTSM	EPR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.19%	8.43%	-8.24%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	0.32%	17.61%	-17.29%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.51%	25.42%	-24.91%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	0.49%	26.91%	-26.42%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	0.88%	42.43%	-41.55%