FTSL vs. ESHY
FTSL (First Trust Senior Loan Fund) and ESHY (Xtrackers J.P. Morgan ESG USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF) are both High Yield Bonds funds. FTSL is actively managed, while ESHY is passively managed. FTSL charges 0.86%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for ESHY.
Performance
FTSL vs. ESHY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
FTSL
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- 0.20%
- YTD
- 0.65%
- 6M
- 0.98%
- 1Y
- 4.56%
- 3Y*
- 7.36%
- 5Y*
- 5.02%
- 10Y*
- 4.44%
ESHY
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FTSL vs. ESHY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
FTSL First Trust Senior Loan Fund | 1.30% |
ESHY Xtrackers J.P. Morgan ESG USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 0.00% |
FTSL vs. ESHY - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FTSL
ESHY
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Basic Materials
FTSL
ESHY
-
Communication Services
FTSL
-
ESHY
-
Consumer Cyclical
FTSL
-
ESHY
-
Consumer Defensive
FTSL
-
ESHY
-
Energy
FTSL
-
ESHY
Financial Services
FTSL
-
ESHY
-
Healthcare
FTSL
-
ESHY
-
Industrials
FTSL
-
ESHY
-
Real Estate
FTSL
-
ESHY
-
Technology
FTSL
-
ESHY
-
Utilities
FTSL
-
ESHY
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FTSL vs. ESHY — Risk / Return Rank
FTSL
ESHY
FTSL vs. ESHY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Senior Loan Fund (FTSL) and Xtrackers J.P. Morgan ESG USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (ESHY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FTSL | ESHY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.51 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.97 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.30 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FTSL | ESHY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.17 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.51 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.86 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.85 | — | — |
Drawdowns
FTSL vs. ESHY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FTSL drawdown since its inception was -22.67%, which is greater than ESHY's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTSL and ESHY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FTSL | ESHY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.67% | 0.00% | -22.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.33% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -2.66% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -6.96% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -22.67% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.76% | 0.00% | -0.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.63% | — | — |
Volatility
FTSL vs. ESHY - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FTSL | ESHY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.36% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.95% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.11% | 0.00% | +2.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.35% | 0.00% | +3.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.18% | 0.00% | +5.18% |
FTSL vs. ESHY - Expense Ratio Comparison
FTSL has a 0.86% expense ratio, which is higher than ESHY's 0.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
FTSL vs. ESHY - Dividend Comparison
FTSL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.46%, while ESHY has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ESHY Xtrackers J.P. Morgan ESG USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FTSL First Trust Senior Loan Fund | 6.46% | 6.59% | 7.56% | 7.59% | 4.77% | 3.17% | 3.48% | 4.44% | 4.29% | 3.64% | 3.70% | 3.95% |
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, ESHY is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ESHY is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.86% for FTSL.
FTSL has the higher dividend yield at 6.46%, compared with 0.00% for ESHY.
They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Deutsche Bank. Their fees differ too: 0.86% for FTSL and 0.20% for ESHY.
Find the right allocation for FTSL and ESHY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer