PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FTSD vs. MBSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FTSD vs. MBSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Short Duration U.S. Government ETF (FTSD) and Regan Fixed Rate MBS ETF (MBSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FTSD achieves a 0.80% return, which is significantly lower than MBSX's 6.22% return.


FTSD

1D
-0.12%
1M
0.17%
YTD
0.80%
6M
1.30%
1Y
4.31%
3Y*
4.98%
5Y*
2.46%
10Y*
2.05%

MBSX

1D
9.68%
1M
3.16%
YTD
6.22%
6M
6.79%
1Y
13.81%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FTSD vs. MBSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between FTSD and MBSX is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.06

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 2, 2025

0.04

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FTSD vs. MBSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FTSD
FTSD Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
FTSD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTSD Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTSD Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
FTSD Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTSD Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

MBSX
MBSX Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
MBSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MBSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
MBSX Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
MBSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
MBSX Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FTSD vs. MBSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Short Duration U.S. Government ETF (FTSD) and Regan Fixed Rate MBS ETF (MBSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FTSDMBSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+3.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+4.53

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.69

1.15

+0.54

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

9.59

0.50

+9.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

38.36

2.08

+36.28

FTSD vs. MBSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FTSD Sharpe Ratio is 3.30, which is higher than the MBSX Sharpe Ratio of 0.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FTSD and MBSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FTSDMBSXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.30

0.26

+3.04

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.33

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.15

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.04

0.25

+0.79

Drawdowns

FTSD vs. MBSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTSD drawdown since its inception was -5.32%, smaller than the maximum MBSX drawdown of -27.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTSD and MBSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FTSDMBSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-5.32%

-27.57%

+22.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.45%

-27.57%

+27.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.93%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-5.04%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-5.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.12%

-20.56%

+20.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.60%

-6.02%

+5.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.11%

6.64%

-6.53%

Volatility

FTSD vs. MBSX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Franklin Short Duration U.S. Government ETF (FTSD) is 0.51%, while Regan Fixed Rate MBS ETF (MBSX) has a volatility of 41.45%. This indicates that FTSD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MBSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FTSDMBSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.51%

41.45%

-40.94%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.03%

50.89%

-49.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.31%

53.40%

-52.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.85%

54.70%

-52.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.79%

54.70%

-52.91%

FTSD vs. MBSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FTSD has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than MBSX's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

FTSD vs. MBSX - Dividend Comparison

FTSD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.50%, more than MBSX's 3.36% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FTSD
Franklin Short Duration U.S. Government ETF
4.50%4.67%4.75%4.14%1.73%1.01%1.54%2.90%2.63%2.24%1.92%1.52%
MBSX
Regan Fixed Rate MBS ETF
3.36%2.77%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FTSD and MBSX have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MBSX has higher volatility (41.45%) compared to FTSD (0.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTSD dropped -5.32% vs MBSX's -27.57%.

On 1-year performance, MBSX leads with 13.81% vs 4.31% for FTSD. On fees, FTSD is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, FTSD has been the lower-risk option at 0.51%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, MBSX has performed better with a 13.81% return vs 4.31%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FTSD is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for MBSX.

FTSD has the higher dividend yield at 4.50%, compared with 3.36% for MBSX.

They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and Regan. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for FTSD and 0.40% for MBSX.

FTSD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.30 vs 0.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FTSD and MBSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer