FTSD vs. EVMO
FTSD (Franklin Short Duration U.S. Government ETF) and EVMO (Eaton Vance Mortgage Opportunities ETF) are both Mortgage Backed Securities funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FTSD charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for EVMO.
Performance
FTSD vs. EVMO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FTSD achieves a 0.80% return, which is significantly higher than EVMO's 0.73% return.
FTSD
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- 0.17%
- YTD
- 0.80%
- 6M
- 1.30%
- 1Y
- 4.31%
- 3Y*
- 4.98%
- 5Y*
- 2.46%
- 10Y*
- 2.05%
EVMO
- 1D
- -0.25%
- 1M
- 0.14%
- YTD
- 0.73%
- 6M
- 0.92%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FTSD vs. EVMO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
FTSD Franklin Short Duration U.S. Government ETF | 0.80% | 2.34% |
EVMO Eaton Vance Mortgage Opportunities ETF | 0.73% | 3.33% |
Correlation
The correlation between FTSD and EVMO is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 5, 2025 | 0.34 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FTSD vs. EVMO — Risk / Return Rank
FTSD
EVMO
FTSD vs. EVMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Short Duration U.S. Government ETF (FTSD) and Eaton Vance Mortgage Opportunities ETF (EVMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FTSD | EVMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.69 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 9.59 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 38.36 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FTSD | EVMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.30 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.33 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.15 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.04 | 1.76 | -0.71 |
Drawdowns
FTSD vs. EVMO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FTSD drawdown since its inception was -5.32%, which is greater than EVMO's maximum drawdown of -1.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTSD and EVMO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FTSD | EVMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -5.32% | -1.89% | -3.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.45% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -0.93% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -5.04% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -5.32% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.12% | -0.91% | +0.79% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.60% | -0.38% | -0.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.11% | — | — |
Volatility
FTSD vs. EVMO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FTSD | EVMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.51% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.03% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.31% | 2.83% | -1.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.85% | 2.83% | -0.98% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.79% | 2.83% | -1.04% |
FTSD vs. EVMO - Expense Ratio Comparison
FTSD has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than EVMO's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
FTSD vs. EVMO - Dividend Comparison
FTSD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.50%, more than EVMO's 4.07% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EVMO Eaton Vance Mortgage Opportunities ETF | 4.07% | 1.95% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FTSD Franklin Short Duration U.S. Government ETF | 4.50% | 4.67% | 4.75% | 4.14% | 1.73% | 1.01% | 1.54% | 2.90% | 2.63% | 2.24% | 1.92% | 1.52% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FTSD and EVMO have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FTSD is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FTSD is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for EVMO.
FTSD has the higher dividend yield at 4.50%, compared with 4.07% for EVMO.
They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and Eaton Vance. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for FTSD and 0.45% for EVMO.
Find the right allocation for FTSD and EVMO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer