FTRFX vs. QILGX
Compare and contrast key facts about Federated Hermes Total Return Bond Fund (FTRFX) and Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Growth Fund (QILGX).
FTRFX is managed by Federated. It was launched on Oct 1, 1996. QILGX is managed by Federated. It was launched on Sep 15, 2005.
Performance
FTRFX vs. QILGX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FTRFX vs. QILGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTRFX Federated Hermes Total Return Bond Fund | -1.11% | 7.28% | 1.02% | 4.23% | -13.31% | -0.47% | 9.19% | 9.42% | -1.14% | 4.10% |
QILGX Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Growth Fund | -12.41% | 19.46% | 40.83% | 39.63% | -24.86% | 30.46% | 38.39% | 32.01% | 1.52% | 25.42% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FTRFX achieves a -1.11% return, which is significantly higher than QILGX's -12.41% return. Over the past 10 years, FTRFX has underperformed QILGX with an annualized return of 1.91%, while QILGX has yielded a comparatively higher 17.51% annualized return.
FTRFX
- 1D
- 0.53%
- 1M
- -2.28%
- YTD
- -1.11%
- 6M
- 0.27%
- 1Y
- 3.42%
- 3Y*
- 2.82%
- 5Y*
- -0.20%
- 10Y*
- 1.91%
QILGX
- 1D
- -0.37%
- 1M
- -8.08%
- YTD
- -12.41%
- 6M
- -9.86%
- 1Y
- 13.84%
- 3Y*
- 21.88%
- 5Y*
- 14.85%
- 10Y*
- 17.51%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FTRFX vs. QILGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FTRFX has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is lower than QILGX's 0.75% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FTRFX vs. QILGX — Risk / Return Rank
FTRFX
QILGX
FTRFX vs. QILGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Federated Hermes Total Return Bond Fund (FTRFX) and Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Growth Fund (QILGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FTRFX | QILGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.00 | 0.55 | +0.45 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.50 | 0.89 | +0.61 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.14 | +0.07 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.62 | 0.70 | +0.92 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.79 | 2.32 | +2.47 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FTRFX | QILGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.00 | 0.55 | +0.45 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.03 | 0.71 | -0.74 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.40 | 0.83 | -0.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.01 | 0.55 | +0.46 |
Correlation
The correlation between FTRFX and QILGX is -0.10. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.
Dividends
FTRFX vs. QILGX - Dividend Comparison
FTRFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.93%, more than QILGX's 3.53% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTRFX Federated Hermes Total Return Bond Fund | 3.93% | 4.22% | 3.48% | 2.95% | 2.25% | 3.17% | 4.36% | 3.08% | 3.19% | 2.91% | 3.33% | 3.23% |
QILGX Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Growth Fund | 3.53% | 3.09% | 6.60% | 1.47% | 13.57% | 19.44% | 7.47% | 5.07% | 10.33% | 7.40% | 0.55% | 11.76% |
Drawdowns
FTRFX vs. QILGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FTRFX drawdown since its inception was -17.95%, smaller than the maximum QILGX drawdown of -53.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTRFX and QILGX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FTRFX | QILGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.95% | -53.48% | +35.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.80% | -15.55% | +12.75% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.95% | -30.05% | +12.10% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -17.95% | -31.68% | +13.73% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.08% | -15.55% | +11.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.24% | -9.01% | +6.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.95% | 4.69% | -3.74% |
Volatility
FTRFX vs. QILGX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Federated Hermes Total Return Bond Fund (FTRFX) is 1.35%, while Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Growth Fund (QILGX) has a volatility of 5.49%. This indicates that FTRFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QILGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FTRFX | QILGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.35% | 5.49% | -4.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.55% | 12.94% | -10.39% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.55% | 19.67% | -15.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.83% | 20.98% | -15.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.76% | 21.19% | -16.43% |