FTRBX vs. TCPYX
Compare and contrast key facts about Federated Hermes Total Return Bond Fund Institutional Shares (FTRBX) and Touchstone Impact Bond Fund (TCPYX).
FTRBX is managed by Federated. It was launched on Oct 1, 1996. TCPYX is managed by Touchstone. It was launched on Nov 15, 1991.
Performance
FTRBX vs. TCPYX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FTRBX vs. TCPYX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTRBX Federated Hermes Total Return Bond Fund Institutional Shares | -0.85% | 7.60% | 2.03% | 5.20% | -13.13% | -0.21% | 9.52% | 9.75% | -0.85% | 4.41% |
TCPYX Touchstone Impact Bond Fund | 0.31% | 6.75% | 1.77% | 5.32% | -13.07% | -1.01% | 6.72% | 7.91% | 0.16% | 3.94% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FTRBX achieves a -0.85% return, which is significantly lower than TCPYX's 0.31% return. Over the past 10 years, FTRBX has outperformed TCPYX with an annualized return of 2.33%, while TCPYX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.70% annualized return.
FTRBX
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- -1.77%
- YTD
- -0.85%
- 6M
- 0.29%
- 1Y
- 3.71%
- 3Y*
- 3.65%
- 5Y*
- 0.33%
- 10Y*
- 2.33%
TCPYX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -1.19%
- YTD
- 0.31%
- 6M
- 1.12%
- 1Y
- 4.19%
- 3Y*
- 3.75%
- 5Y*
- 0.27%
- 10Y*
- 1.70%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FTRBX vs. TCPYX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FTRBX has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than TCPYX's 0.51% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FTRBX vs. TCPYX — Risk / Return Rank
FTRBX
TCPYX
FTRBX vs. TCPYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Federated Hermes Total Return Bond Fund Institutional Shares (FTRBX) and Touchstone Impact Bond Fund (TCPYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FTRBX | TCPYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.89 | 0.89 | 0.00 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.31 | 1.29 | +0.02 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.16 | +0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.41 | 1.50 | -0.09 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.14 | 4.11 | +0.03 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FTRBX | TCPYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.89 | 0.89 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.06 | 0.05 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.49 | 0.35 | +0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.08 | 0.69 | +0.39 |
Correlation
The correlation between FTRBX and TCPYX is 0.78, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FTRBX vs. TCPYX - Dividend Comparison
FTRBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.20%, more than TCPYX's 3.89% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTRBX Federated Hermes Total Return Bond Fund Institutional Shares | 4.20% | 4.52% | 4.47% | 3.84% | 2.47% | 3.43% | 4.66% | 3.38% | 3.49% | 3.21% | 3.35% | 3.53% |
TCPYX Touchstone Impact Bond Fund | 3.89% | 3.52% | 3.68% | 3.22% | 2.63% | 1.91% | 2.13% | 2.63% | 2.86% | 2.77% | 2.98% | 2.91% |
Drawdowns
FTRBX vs. TCPYX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FTRBX drawdown since its inception was -17.49%, roughly equal to the maximum TCPYX drawdown of -18.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTRBX and TCPYX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FTRBX | TCPYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.49% | -18.12% | +0.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.80% | -2.94% | +0.14% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.49% | -18.12% | +0.63% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -17.49% | -18.12% | +0.63% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.07% | -2.19% | +0.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.03% | -3.23% | +1.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.95% | 1.07% | -0.12% |
Volatility
FTRBX vs. TCPYX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Federated Hermes Total Return Bond Fund Institutional Shares (FTRBX) is 1.37%, while Touchstone Impact Bond Fund (TCPYX) has a volatility of 1.50%. This indicates that FTRBX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TCPYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FTRBX | TCPYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.37% | 1.50% | -0.13% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.55% | 2.62% | -0.07% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.44% | 4.49% | -0.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.85% | 5.87% | -0.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.78% | 4.83% | -0.05% |