FTRB vs. VPLS
FTRB (Federated Hermes Total Return Bond ETF) and VPLS (Vanguard Core-Plus Bond ETF) are both Intermediate Core-Plus Bond funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, FTRB returned 5.52% vs 5.91% for VPLS. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FTRB charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for VPLS.
Performance
FTRB vs. VPLS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FTRB achieves a 0.07% return, which is significantly lower than VPLS's 0.64% return.
FTRB
- 1D
- -0.20%
- 1M
- 0.03%
- YTD
- 0.07%
- 6M
- -0.04%
- 1Y
- 5.52%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VPLS
- 1D
- -0.21%
- 1M
- 0.35%
- YTD
- 0.64%
- 6M
- 0.57%
- 1Y
- 5.91%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FTRB vs. VPLS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
FTRB Federated Hermes Total Return Bond ETF | 0.07% | 7.60% | 2.56% |
VPLS Vanguard Core-Plus Bond ETF | 0.64% | 7.86% | 3.74% |
Correlation
The correlation between FTRB and VPLS is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2024 | 0.83 |
The correlation between FTRB and VPLS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.
FTRB vs. VPLS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FTRB
VPLS
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
FTRB
VPLS
-
Basic Materials
FTRB
-
VPLS
-
Communication Services
FTRB
-
VPLS
-
Consumer Cyclical
FTRB
-
VPLS
-
Consumer Defensive
FTRB
-
VPLS
-
Energy
FTRB
-
VPLS
Financial Services
FTRB
-
VPLS
Healthcare
FTRB
-
VPLS
-
Industrials
FTRB
-
VPLS
-
Real Estate
FTRB
-
VPLS
Technology
FTRB
-
VPLS
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FTRB vs. VPLS — Risk / Return Rank
FTRB
VPLS
FTRB vs. VPLS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Federated Hermes Total Return Bond ETF (FTRB) and Vanguard Core-Plus Bond ETF (VPLS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FTRB | VPLS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.08 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.16 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.29 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.98 | 2.18 | -0.20 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.22 | 7.10 | -0.89 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FTRB | VPLS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.54 | 1.63 | -0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.93 | 1.24 | -0.31 |
Drawdowns
FTRB vs. VPLS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FTRB drawdown since its inception was -4.83%, which is greater than VPLS's maximum drawdown of -4.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTRB and VPLS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FTRB | VPLS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -4.83% | -4.17% | -0.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.80% | -2.72% | -0.08% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.58% | -1.21% | -0.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.29% | -1.01% | -0.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.89% | 0.83% | +0.06% |
Volatility
FTRB vs. VPLS - Volatility Comparison
Federated Hermes Total Return Bond ETF (FTRB) and Vanguard Core-Plus Bond ETF (VPLS) have volatilities of 1.31% and 1.27%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FTRB | VPLS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.31% | 1.27% | +0.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.62% | 2.69% | -0.07% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.59% | 3.65% | -0.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.56% | 4.61% | -0.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.56% | 4.61% | -0.05% |
FTRB vs. VPLS - Expense Ratio Comparison
FTRB has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than VPLS's 0.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
FTRB vs. VPLS - Dividend Comparison
FTRB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.30%, less than VPLS's 4.76% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
FTRB Federated Hermes Total Return Bond ETF | 4.30% | 4.46% | 4.40% | 0.00% |
VPLS Vanguard Core-Plus Bond ETF | 4.76% | 4.78% | 4.52% | 0.18% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FTRB and VPLS have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FTRB has higher volatility (1.31%) compared to VPLS (1.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTRB dropped -4.83% vs VPLS's -4.17%.
On 1-year performance, VPLS leads with 5.91% vs 5.52% for FTRB. On fees, VPLS is cheaper at 0.20% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, VPLS has performed better with a 5.91% return vs 5.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VPLS is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for FTRB.
VPLS has the higher dividend yield at 4.76%, compared with 4.30% for FTRB.
They also come from different issuers: Federated and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for FTRB and 0.20% for VPLS.
VPLS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.63 vs 1.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FTRB and VPLS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer