PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FTQGX vs. IOLZX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FTQGX vs. IOLZX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Focused Stock Fund (FTQGX) and ICON Equity Fund (IOLZX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FTQGX achieves a 26.34% return, which is significantly lower than IOLZX's 28.15% return. Over the past 10 years, FTQGX has outperformed IOLZX with an annualized return of 19.07%, while IOLZX has yielded a comparatively lower 14.51% annualized return.


FTQGX

1D
1.30%
1M
10.43%
YTD
26.34%
6M
25.73%
1Y
52.54%
3Y*
30.42%
5Y*
16.78%
10Y*
19.07%

IOLZX

1D
2.03%
1M
8.48%
YTD
28.15%
6M
30.91%
1Y
50.12%
3Y*
24.88%
5Y*
11.20%
10Y*
14.51%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FTQGX vs. IOLZX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FTQGX
Fidelity Focused Stock Fund
26.34%13.65%36.95%28.94%-26.68%26.91%33.41%31.44%4.90%30.66%
IOLZX
ICON Equity Fund
28.15%15.81%16.87%12.13%-17.78%26.72%16.00%38.22%-16.69%26.78%

Correlation

The correlation between FTQGX and IOLZX is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.71

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.64

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.76

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 4, 2004

0.82

The correlation between FTQGX and IOLZX shifts across timeframes, from 0.64 (3 years) to 0.82 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FTQGX vs. IOLZX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FTQGX
FTQGX Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
FTQGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTQGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTQGX Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
FTQGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTQGX Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

IOLZX
IOLZX Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
IOLZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IOLZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
IOLZX Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
IOLZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
IOLZX Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FTQGX vs. IOLZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Focused Stock Fund (FTQGX) and ICON Equity Fund (IOLZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FTQGXIOLZXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.25

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.46

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.24

3.65

+0.60

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.25

12.92

+5.34

FTQGX vs. IOLZX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FTQGX Sharpe Ratio is 2.72, which is comparable to the IOLZX Sharpe Ratio of 2.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FTQGX and IOLZX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FTQGXIOLZXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.72

2.77

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

0.53

+0.25

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.89

0.65

+0.24

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.51

0.41

+0.10

Drawdowns

FTQGX vs. IOLZX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTQGX drawdown since its inception was -61.29%, which is greater than IOLZX's maximum drawdown of -56.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTQGX and IOLZX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FTQGXIOLZXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.29%

-56.03%

-5.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.76%

-14.35%

+1.59%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.84%

-24.71%

-2.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.31%

-27.77%

-4.54%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.31%

-41.04%

+8.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.19%

-12.63%

-1.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.96%

4.04%

-1.08%

Volatility

FTQGX vs. IOLZX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Focused Stock Fund (FTQGX) has a higher volatility of 7.14% compared to ICON Equity Fund (IOLZX) at 6.36%. This indicates that FTQGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IOLZX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FTQGXIOLZXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.14%

6.36%

+0.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.42%

14.98%

+0.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.91%

18.86%

+1.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.67%

21.43%

+0.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.57%

22.36%

-0.79%

FTQGX vs. IOLZX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FTQGX has a 0.86% expense ratio, which is lower than IOLZX's 1.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

FTQGX vs. IOLZX - Dividend Comparison

FTQGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.85%, more than IOLZX's 8.34% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FTQGX
Fidelity Focused Stock Fund
9.85%12.44%9.94%0.61%7.96%13.53%11.41%5.07%14.71%5.89%1.08%5.91%
IOLZX
ICON Equity Fund
8.34%10.69%22.21%4.75%18.57%14.12%0.00%3.46%1.60%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FTQGX and IOLZX have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FTQGX has higher volatility (7.14%) compared to IOLZX (6.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTQGX dropped -61.29% vs IOLZX's -56.03%.

IOLZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.77 vs 2.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FTQGX and IOLZX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer