PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FTMSX vs. FSLAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FTMSX vs. FSLAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fuller & Thaler Behavioral Micro-Cap Equity Fund (FTMSX) and Fidelity Advisor 529 Small Cap Portfolio Class A (FSLAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FTMSX achieves a 22.38% return, which is significantly higher than FSLAX's 19.59% return.


FTMSX

1D
2.90%
1M
-6.49%
6M
16.01%
YTD
22.38%
1Y
36.98%
3Y*
7.22%
5Y*
0.33%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
8.55%

FSLAX

1D
1.55%
1M
-1.77%
6M
14.20%
YTD
19.59%
1Y
30.89%
3Y*
15.42%
5Y*
8.42%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
10.71%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

FTMSX vs. FSLAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
FTMSX
Fuller & Thaler Behavioral Micro-Cap Equity Fund
22.38%0.30%3.88%13.11%-31.07%37.45%15.58%17.82%
FSLAX
Fidelity Advisor 529 Small Cap Portfolio Class A
19.59%11.61%11.03%18.03%-20.87%31.07%16.96%31.85%

Correlation

The correlation between FTMSX and FSLAX is 0.68, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.68

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.77

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2019

0.83

The correlation between FTMSX and FSLAX shifts across timeframes, from 0.68 (1 year) to 0.83 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FTMSX vs. FSLAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FTMSX
FTMSX Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
FTMSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTMSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTMSX Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
FTMSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTMSX Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

FSLAX
FSLAX Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
FSLAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSLAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSLAX Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
FSLAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSLAX Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FTMSX vs. FSLAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fuller & Thaler Behavioral Micro-Cap Equity Fund (FTMSX) and Fidelity Advisor 529 Small Cap Portfolio Class A (FSLAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FTMSXFSLAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.45

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.70

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.29

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.87

3.38

-1.50

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.85

11.59

-4.74

FTMSX vs. FSLAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FTMSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.26, which is comparable to the FSLAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FTMSX and FSLAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FTMSX vs. FSLAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTMSX drawdown since its inception was -53.12%, which is greater than FSLAX's maximum drawdown of -39.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTMSX and FSLAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FTMSXFSLAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.12%

-39.85%

-13.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.52%

-9.36%

-8.16%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-35.01%

-26.37%

-8.64%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-48.67%

-32.48%

-16.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.11%

-4.36%

-4.75%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.97%

-8.60%

-13.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.78%

2.66%

+2.12%

Volatility

FTMSX vs. FSLAX - Volatility Comparison

Fuller & Thaler Behavioral Micro-Cap Equity Fund (FTMSX) has a higher volatility of 7.94% compared to Fidelity Advisor 529 Small Cap Portfolio Class A (FSLAX) at 4.44%. This indicates that FTMSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSLAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FTMSXFSLAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.94%

4.44%

+3.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.97%

13.87%

+5.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.16%

18.55%

+7.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.11%

22.16%

+5.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

30.47%

22.05%

+8.42%

Dividends

FTMSX vs. FSLAX - Dividend Comparison

Neither FTMSX nor FSLAX has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
FSLAX
Fidelity Advisor 529 Small Cap Portfolio Class A
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FTMSX
Fuller & Thaler Behavioral Micro-Cap Equity Fund
0.00%0.00%0.12%0.00%0.00%8.27%0.37%4.90%

Frequently Asked Questions


FTMSX and FSLAX have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FTMSX has higher volatility (7.94%) compared to FSLAX (4.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTMSX dropped -53.12% vs FSLAX's -39.85%.

FSLAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.71 vs 1.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FTMSX and FSLAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer