PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FTLS vs. NFTY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FTLS vs. NFTY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Long/Short Equity ETF (FTLS) and First Trust India NIFTY 50 Equal Weight ETF (NFTY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FTLS achieves a 5.34% return, which is significantly higher than NFTY's -9.70% return. Over the past 10 years, FTLS has outperformed NFTY with an annualized return of 9.83%, while NFTY has yielded a comparatively lower 8.13% annualized return.


FTLS

1D
0.12%
1M
2.01%
YTD
5.34%
6M
5.22%
1Y
14.27%
3Y*
14.31%
5Y*
10.27%
10Y*
9.83%

NFTY

1D
-1.34%
1M
-1.64%
YTD
-9.70%
6M
-7.99%
1Y
-8.48%
3Y*
5.72%
5Y*
4.62%
10Y*
8.13%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FTLS vs. NFTY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FTLS
First Trust Long/Short Equity ETF
5.34%9.09%18.80%16.94%-5.56%19.65%2.56%16.16%-4.81%14.41%
NFTY
First Trust India NIFTY 50 Equal Weight ETF
-9.70%5.47%5.18%24.00%-3.46%26.83%10.04%0.58%-1.51%21.78%

Correlation

The correlation between FTLS and NFTY is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.26

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.29

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.37

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.31

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 11, 2014

0.33

The correlation between FTLS and NFTY shifts across timeframes, from 0.26 (1 year) to 0.37 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FTLS vs. NFTY - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FTLS
NFTY

Technology

26.9%
9.2%

Financial Services

19.9%
21.2%

Consumer Cyclical

9.5%
16.3%

Healthcare

8.4%
9.7%

Industrials

7.6%
8.3%

Energy

7.3%
8.5%

Consumer Defensive

6.5%
8.3%

Communication Services

6.1%
2.0%

Basic Materials

5.1%
12.5%

Real Estate

1.9%

-

Utilities

0.9%
4.0%

Technology

FTLS
26.9%
NFTY
9.2%

Financial Services

FTLS
19.9%
NFTY
21.2%

Consumer Cyclical

FTLS
9.5%
NFTY
16.3%

Healthcare

FTLS
8.4%
NFTY
9.7%

Industrials

FTLS
7.6%
NFTY
8.3%

Energy

FTLS
7.3%
NFTY
8.5%

Consumer Defensive

FTLS
6.5%
NFTY
8.3%

Communication Services

FTLS
6.1%
NFTY
2.0%

Basic Materials

FTLS
5.1%
NFTY
12.5%

Real Estate

FTLS
1.9%
NFTY

-

Utilities

FTLS
0.9%
NFTY
4.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FTLS vs. NFTY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FTLS
FTLS Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
FTLS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTLS Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTLS Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
FTLS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTLS Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

NFTY
NFTY Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
NFTY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NFTY Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
NFTY Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
NFTY Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
NFTY Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FTLS vs. NFTY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Long/Short Equity ETF (FTLS) and First Trust India NIFTY 50 Equal Weight ETF (NFTY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FTLSNFTYDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.75

-0.58

+2.33

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.56

-0.78

+3.33

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

0.91

+0.41

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.79

-0.53

+4.31

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

11.78

-1.39

+13.17

FTLS vs. NFTY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FTLS Sharpe Ratio is 1.75, which is higher than the NFTY Sharpe Ratio of -0.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FTLS and NFTY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FTLSNFTYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.75

-0.58

+2.33

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

0.27

+0.71

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.87

0.39

+0.48

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.81

0.28

+0.53

Drawdowns

FTLS vs. NFTY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTLS drawdown since its inception was -20.54%, smaller than the maximum NFTY drawdown of -47.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTLS and NFTY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FTLSNFTYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.54%

-47.67%

+27.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.79%

-16.14%

+12.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.69%

-21.55%

+9.86%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-11.69%

-21.55%

+9.86%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-20.54%

-47.67%

+27.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.03%

-17.45%

+17.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.69%

-9.58%

+6.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.21%

6.12%

-4.91%

Volatility

FTLS vs. NFTY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Long/Short Equity ETF (FTLS) is 1.81%, while First Trust India NIFTY 50 Equal Weight ETF (NFTY) has a volatility of 4.58%. This indicates that FTLS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NFTY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FTLSNFTYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.81%

4.58%

-2.77%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.65%

12.57%

-6.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.18%

14.72%

-6.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.55%

17.39%

-6.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.30%

20.72%

-9.42%

FTLS vs. NFTY - Expense Ratio Comparison

FTLS has a 1.60% expense ratio, which is higher than NFTY's 0.80% expense ratio.


Dividends

FTLS vs. NFTY - Dividend Comparison

FTLS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.90%, less than NFTY's 1.96% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FTLS
First Trust Long/Short Equity ETF
0.90%1.07%1.50%1.49%0.81%0.01%0.44%0.83%0.87%0.43%1.04%0.49%
NFTY
First Trust India NIFTY 50 Equal Weight ETF
1.96%1.24%1.61%0.13%5.89%1.53%0.61%0.97%0.00%4.10%3.28%4.39%

Frequently Asked Questions


FTLS and NFTY have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NFTY has higher volatility (4.58%) compared to FTLS (1.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTLS dropped -20.54% vs NFTY's -47.67%.

On 10-year performance, FTLS leads with 9.83% vs 8.13% for NFTY. On fees, NFTY is cheaper at 0.80% per year. On volatility, FTLS has been the lower-risk option at 1.81%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, FTLS has performed better with a 9.83% return vs 8.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

NFTY is cheaper with a 0.80% expense ratio, compared with 1.60% for FTLS.

NFTY has the higher dividend yield at 1.96%, compared with 0.90% for FTLS.

FTLS is categorized as Long-Short, while NFTY is Asia Pacific Equities. Their fees differ too: 1.60% for FTLS and 0.80% for NFTY.

FTLS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.75 vs -0.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FTLS and NFTY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer