PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FTHSX vs. PRCGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FTHSX vs. PRCGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FullerThaler Behavioral Small-Cap Equity Fund Class I (FTHSX) and Perritt MicroCap Opportunities Fund (PRCGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


FTHSX

1D
0.47%
1M
1.61%
YTD
10.63%
6M
11.14%
1Y
27.04%
3Y*
19.70%
5Y*
11.55%
10Y*
14.13%

PRCGX

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FTHSX vs. PRCGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FTHSX
FullerThaler Behavioral Small-Cap Equity Fund Class I
10.63%12.02%16.17%22.55%-7.49%30.83%10.38%28.06%-13.18%17.35%
PRCGX
Perritt MicroCap Opportunities Fund
13.20%8.36%10.29%12.07%-16.05%31.15%8.88%9.37%-17.61%6.60%

Correlation

The correlation between FTHSX and PRCGX is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.63

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.78

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 29, 2015

0.83

Over the past year, the correlation between FTHSX and PRCGX has dropped to 0.63 - well below their long-term average of 0.83, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FTHSX vs. PRCGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FTHSX
FTHSX Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
FTHSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTHSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTHSX Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
FTHSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTHSX Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

PRCGX
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FTHSX vs. PRCGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FullerThaler Behavioral Small-Cap Equity Fund Class I (FTHSX) and Perritt MicroCap Opportunities Fund (PRCGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FTHSXPRCGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.87

FTHSX vs. PRCGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FTHSXPRCGXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.89

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.70

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.67

Drawdowns

FTHSX vs. PRCGX - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FTHSXPRCGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.42%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.58%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.58%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.64%

Volatility

FTHSX vs. PRCGX - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FTHSXPRCGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.91%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.13%

FTHSX vs. PRCGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FTHSX has a 0.76% expense ratio, which is lower than PRCGX's 1.56% expense ratio.


Dividends

FTHSX vs. PRCGX - Dividend Comparison

FTHSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.49%, less than PRCGX's 12.01% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FTHSX
FullerThaler Behavioral Small-Cap Equity Fund Class I
0.49%0.54%8.05%1.81%1.23%3.77%0.35%0.39%0.55%0.26%0.00%15.40%
PRCGX
Perritt MicroCap Opportunities Fund
12.01%8.78%8.28%7.34%3.26%15.00%0.00%3.50%14.70%28.27%9.03%1.67%

Frequently Asked Questions


FTHSX and PRCGX have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FTHSX and PRCGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer