PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FTHRX vs. CRAIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FTHRX vs. CRAIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Intermediate Bond Fund (FTHRX) and CCM Community Impact Bond Fund (CRAIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FTHRX achieves a -0.24% return, which is significantly lower than CRAIX's 0.15% return. Over the past 10 years, FTHRX has outperformed CRAIX with an annualized return of 1.95%, while CRAIX has yielded a comparatively lower 0.95% annualized return.


FTHRX

1D
-0.20%
1M
0.22%
YTD
-0.24%
6M
0.16%
1Y
3.22%
3Y*
4.50%
5Y*
1.02%
10Y*
1.95%

CRAIX

1D
-0.21%
1M
0.26%
YTD
0.15%
6M
0.30%
1Y
3.67%
3Y*
3.62%
5Y*
0.13%
10Y*
0.95%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FTHRX vs. CRAIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FTHRX
Fidelity Intermediate Bond Fund
-0.24%6.89%3.25%5.55%-9.17%-1.60%7.06%7.20%0.52%2.31%
CRAIX
CCM Community Impact Bond Fund
0.15%6.40%1.97%3.98%-10.19%-1.72%3.99%5.44%0.10%2.81%

Correlation

The correlation between FTHRX and CRAIX is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.89

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 30, 1999

0.82

The correlation between FTHRX and CRAIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FTHRX vs. CRAIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FTHRX
FTHRX Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
FTHRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTHRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTHRX Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
FTHRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTHRX Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank

CRAIX
CRAIX Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
CRAIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CRAIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
CRAIX Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
CRAIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
CRAIX Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FTHRX vs. CRAIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Intermediate Bond Fund (FTHRX) and CCM Community Impact Bond Fund (CRAIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FTHRXCRAIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.24

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.59

1.81

-0.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.39

5.32

-0.92

FTHRX vs. CRAIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FTHRX Sharpe Ratio is 1.20, which is comparable to the CRAIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FTHRX and CRAIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FTHRX vs. CRAIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTHRX drawdown since its inception was -19.01%, which is greater than CRAIX's maximum drawdown of -14.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTHRX and CRAIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FTHRXCRAIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.01%

-14.53%

-4.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.11%

-2.15%

+0.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.68%

-4.84%

+2.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.18%

-14.28%

+1.10%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-13.25%

-14.53%

+1.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.48%

-1.38%

-0.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.06%

-2.46%

-0.60%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.76%

0.73%

+0.03%

Volatility

FTHRX vs. CRAIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Intermediate Bond Fund (FTHRX) is 0.87%, while CCM Community Impact Bond Fund (CRAIX) has a volatility of 0.99%. This indicates that FTHRX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CRAIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FTHRXCRAIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.87%

0.99%

-0.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.09%

2.25%

-0.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.80%

2.95%

-0.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.04%

4.60%

-0.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.40%

3.65%

-0.25%

FTHRX vs. CRAIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FTHRX has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than CRAIX's 0.88% expense ratio.


Dividends

FTHRX vs. CRAIX - Dividend Comparison

FTHRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.71%, more than CRAIX's 3.10% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CRAIX
CCM Community Impact Bond Fund
3.10%3.01%2.92%2.48%1.61%1.18%1.77%2.32%2.30%2.78%2.28%2.12%
FTHRX
Fidelity Intermediate Bond Fund
3.71%3.59%3.49%2.94%1.55%1.53%4.16%2.49%2.48%2.20%2.63%2.13%

Frequently Asked Questions


FTHRX and CRAIX have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CRAIX has higher volatility (0.99%) compared to FTHRX (0.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTHRX dropped -19.01% vs CRAIX's -14.53%.

CRAIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.32 vs 1.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FTHRX and CRAIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer