FTHM vs. SOUN

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FTHM (Fathom Holdings Inc.) and SOUN (SoundHound AI Inc) are both stocks. FTHM operates in Real Estate - Services (Real Estate), while SOUN operates in Software - Application (Technology). Over the past 3 years, FTHM returned -56.09%/yr vs 40.71%/yr for SOUN. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

FTHM vs. SOUN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fathom Holdings Inc. (FTHM) and SoundHound AI Inc (SOUN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FTHM achieves a -47.02% return, which is significantly lower than SOUN's -18.96% return.

FTHM

• 1D: -1.13%
• 1M: -39.02%
• YTD: -47.02%
• 6M: -56.50%
• 1Y: -58.20%
• 3Y*: -56.09%
• 5Y*: -55.63%
• 10Y*: —

SOUN

• 1D: -8.39%
• 1M: -14.68%
• YTD: -18.96%
• 6M: -31.41%
• 1Y: -18.63%
• 3Y*: 40.71%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FTHM vs. SOUN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
FTHM Fathom Holdings Inc.	-47.02%	-33.99%	-57.38%	-15.53%	-44.37%
SOUN SoundHound AI Inc	-18.96%	-49.75%	835.85%	19.77%	-76.40%

Correlation

The correlation between FTHM and SOUN is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.20
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.18
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 29, 2022	0.16

Fundamentals

Market Cap FTHM : $17.23M SOUN : $2.73B
EPS FTHM : -$0.68 SOUN : -$0.43
PS Ratio FTHM : 0.04 SOUN : 17.23
PB Ratio FTHM : 0.46 SOUN : 5.94
Total Revenue (TTM) FTHM : $420.48M SOUN : $183.99M
Gross Profit (TTM) FTHM : -$24.12M SOUN : $69.84M
EBITDA (TTM) FTHM : -$14.68M SOUN : -$124.47M

Return for Risk

FTHM vs. SOUN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FTHM

FTHM Risk / Return Rank: 20
FTHM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 20
FTHM Sortino Ratio Rank: 24
FTHM Omega Ratio Rank: 25
FTHM Calmar Ratio Rank: 15
FTHM Martin Ratio Rank: 18

SOUN

SOUN Risk / Return Rank: 33
SOUN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 31
SOUN Sortino Ratio Rank: 34
SOUN Omega Ratio Rank: 33
SOUN Calmar Ratio Rank: 32
SOUN Martin Ratio Rank: 33

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FTHM vs. SOUN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fathom Holdings Inc. (FTHM) and SoundHound AI Inc (SOUN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FTHM	SOUN	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.49	-0.23	-0.26
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-0.29	0.22	-0.51
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.97	1.02	-0.05
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.72	-0.26	-0.46
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-1.11	-0.42	-0.68
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FTHM vs. SOUN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FTHM Sharpe Ratio is -0.49, which is lower than the SOUN Sharpe Ratio of -0.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FTHM and SOUN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FTHM	SOUN	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.49	-0.23	-0.26
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.61	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.43	0.01	-0.44

Drawdowns

FTHM vs. SOUN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTHM drawdown since its inception was -99.02%, which is greater than SOUN's maximum drawdown of -93.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTHM and SOUN.

Drawdown Indicators

	FTHM	SOUN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-99.02%	-93.55%	-5.47%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-81.33%	-72.43%	-8.90%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-93.46%	-75.65%	-17.81%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-98.56%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-99.01%	-66.65%	-32.36%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-77.65%	-66.95%	-10.70%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	52.59%	43.94%	+8.65%

Volatility

FTHM vs. SOUN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fathom Holdings Inc. (FTHM) is 16.39%, while SoundHound AI Inc (SOUN) has a volatility of 18.41%. This indicates that FTHM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SOUN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FTHM	SOUN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	16.39%	18.41%	-2.02%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	66.18%	52.01%	+14.17%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	118.96%	80.52%	+38.44%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	91.66%	136.48%	-44.82%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	92.03%	136.48%	-44.45%

Dividends

FTHM vs. SOUN - Dividend Comparison

Neither FTHM nor SOUN has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FTHM and SOUN in my portfolio?

FTHM and SOUN have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FTHM or SOUN?

SOUN has higher volatility (18.41%) compared to FTHM (16.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTHM dropped -99.02% vs SOUN's -93.55%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SOUN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.23 vs -0.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.