FTHI vs. PEPS
FTHI (First Trust BuyWrite Income ETF) and PEPS (Parametric Equity Plus ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, FTHI returned 17.07% vs 32.12% for PEPS. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FTHI charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for PEPS.
Performance
FTHI vs. PEPS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FTHI achieves a 5.36% return, which is significantly lower than PEPS's 11.10% return.
FTHI
- 1D
- 0.55%
- 1M
- 1.74%
- YTD
- 5.36%
- 6M
- 5.61%
- 1Y
- 17.07%
- 3Y*
- 14.90%
- 5Y*
- 10.29%
- 10Y*
- 8.57%
PEPS
- 1D
- 0.39%
- 1M
- 5.83%
- YTD
- 11.10%
- 6M
- 11.19%
- 1Y
- 32.12%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FTHI vs. PEPS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
FTHI First Trust BuyWrite Income ETF | 5.36% | 11.03% | -0.88% |
PEPS Parametric Equity Plus ETF | 11.10% | 20.32% | -1.45% |
Correlation
The correlation between FTHI and PEPS is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 11, 2024 | 0.91 |
The correlation between FTHI and PEPS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FTHI vs. PEPS — Risk / Return Rank
FTHI
PEPS
FTHI vs. PEPS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust BuyWrite Income ETF (FTHI) and Parametric Equity Plus ETF (PEPS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FTHI | PEPS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.53 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.45 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.45 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.13 | 3.29 | -0.16 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.70 | 15.42 | -1.72 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FTHI | PEPS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.94 | 2.47 | -0.53 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.77 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.60 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.54 | 1.06 | -0.53 |
Drawdowns
FTHI vs. PEPS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FTHI drawdown since its inception was -32.65%, which is greater than PEPS's maximum drawdown of -21.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTHI and PEPS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FTHI | PEPS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.65% | -21.26% | -11.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.47% | -9.80% | +4.33% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.92% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.70% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.65% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.13% | +0.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.68% | -2.76% | -0.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.25% | 2.09% | -0.84% |
Volatility
FTHI vs. PEPS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for First Trust BuyWrite Income ETF (FTHI) is 1.67%, while Parametric Equity Plus ETF (PEPS) has a volatility of 2.68%. This indicates that FTHI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PEPS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FTHI | PEPS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.67% | 2.68% | -1.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.06% | 9.83% | -2.77% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.82% | 13.05% | -4.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.44% | 18.28% | -4.84% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.32% | 18.28% | -3.96% |
FTHI vs. PEPS - Expense Ratio Comparison
FTHI has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than PEPS's 0.10% expense ratio.
Dividends
FTHI vs. PEPS - Dividend Comparison
FTHI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.68%, more than PEPS's 0.88% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTHI First Trust BuyWrite Income ETF | 8.68% | 8.70% | 8.61% | 8.50% | 9.06% | 4.37% | 4.76% | 4.21% | 4.76% | 4.00% | 4.41% | 4.98% |
PEPS Parametric Equity Plus ETF | 0.88% | 1.00% | 0.17% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FTHI and PEPS have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PEPS has higher volatility (2.68%) compared to FTHI (1.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTHI dropped -32.65% vs PEPS's -21.26%.
On 1-year performance, PEPS leads with 32.12% vs 17.07% for FTHI. On fees, PEPS is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, FTHI has been the lower-risk option at 1.67%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, PEPS has performed better with a 32.12% return vs 17.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PEPS is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for FTHI.
FTHI has the higher dividend yield at 8.68%, compared with 0.88% for PEPS.
They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Parametric. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for FTHI and 0.10% for PEPS.
PEPS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.47 vs 1.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FTHI and PEPS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer