FTHF vs. NFTY

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

FTHF (First Trust Emerging Markets Human Flourishing ETF) and NFTY (First Trust India NIFTY 50 Equal Weight ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FTHF is a Emerging Markets Diversified fund tracking the Emerging Markets Human Flourishing Index, while NFTY is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the NIFTY 50 Equal Weight Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, FTHF returned 99.98% vs -6.58% for NFTY. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FTHF charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.80%/yr for NFTY.

Performance

FTHF vs. NFTY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Emerging Markets Human Flourishing ETF (FTHF) and First Trust India NIFTY 50 Equal Weight ETF (NFTY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FTHF achieves a 48.98% return, which is significantly higher than NFTY's -7.30% return.

FTHF

• 1D: -6.80%
• 1M: 6.57%
• YTD: 48.98%
• 6M: 51.53%
• 1Y: 99.98%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

NFTY

• 1D: -1.31%
• 1M: 1.01%
• YTD: -7.30%
• 6M: -7.62%
• 1Y: -6.58%
• 3Y*: 6.30%
• 5Y*: 5.79%
• 10Y*: 8.36%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FTHF vs. NFTY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
FTHF First Trust Emerging Markets Human Flourishing ETF	48.98%	65.30%	-8.14%	18.14%
NFTY First Trust India NIFTY 50 Equal Weight ETF	-7.30%	5.47%	5.18%	13.71%

Correlation

The correlation between FTHF and NFTY is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.45
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 31, 2023	0.41

FTHF vs. NFTY - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FTHF	NFTY
Technology	49.3%	9.0%
Financial Services	24.4%	20.9%
Basic Materials	9.2%	13.1%
Energy	5.3%	8.5%
Industrials	5.1%	8.5%
Consumer Defensive	3.0%	8.1%
Utilities	1.8%	3.7%
Communication Services	0.9%	1.9%
Consumer Cyclical	0.7%	16.6%
Healthcare	0.5%	9.9%
Real Estate	-	-

Return for Risk

FTHF vs. NFTY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FTHF

FTHF Risk / Return Rank: 87
FTHF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
FTHF Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
FTHF Omega Ratio Rank: 89
FTHF Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
FTHF Martin Ratio Rank: 86

NFTY

NFTY Risk / Return Rank: 5
NFTY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
NFTY Sortino Ratio Rank: 5
NFTY Omega Ratio Rank: 5
NFTY Calmar Ratio Rank: 5
NFTY Martin Ratio Rank: 4

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FTHF vs. NFTY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Emerging Markets Human Flourishing ETF (FTHF) and First Trust India NIFTY 50 Equal Weight ETF (NFTY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FTHF	NFTY	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.79	-0.45	+3.24
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.22	-0.58	+3.80
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.52	0.94	+0.59
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	6.16	-0.41	+6.57
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	16.85	-1.01	+17.86

FTHF vs. NFTY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FTHF Sharpe Ratio is 2.79, which is higher than the NFTY Sharpe Ratio of -0.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FTHF and NFTY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FTHF vs. NFTY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTHF drawdown since its inception was -17.36%, smaller than the maximum NFTY drawdown of -47.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTHF and NFTY.

Drawdown Indicators

	FTHF	NFTY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-17.36%	-47.67%	+30.31%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.31%	-16.14%	-0.17%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-21.55%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-21.55%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-47.67%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.80%	-15.26%	+8.46%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.22%	-9.60%	+5.38%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.95%	6.56%	-0.61%

Volatility

FTHF vs. NFTY - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Emerging Markets Human Flourishing ETF (FTHF) has a higher volatility of 17.38% compared to First Trust India NIFTY 50 Equal Weight ETF (NFTY) at 4.23%. This indicates that FTHF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NFTY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FTHF	NFTY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	17.38%	4.23%	+13.15%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	28.89%	12.75%	+16.14%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	36.06%	14.75%	+21.31%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	26.89%	17.41%	+9.48%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	26.89%	20.72%	+6.17%

FTHF vs. NFTY - Expense Ratio Comparison

FTHF has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than NFTY's 0.80% expense ratio.

Dividends

FTHF vs. NFTY - Dividend Comparison

FTHF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.03%, more than NFTY's 1.91% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FTHF First Trust Emerging Markets Human Flourishing ETF	3.03%	4.40%	3.34%	0.51%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
NFTY First Trust India NIFTY 50 Equal Weight ETF	1.91%	1.24%	1.61%	0.13%	5.89%	1.53%	0.61%	0.97%	0.00%	4.10%	3.28%	4.39%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FTHF and NFTY in my portfolio?

FTHF and NFTY have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FTHF or NFTY?

FTHF has higher volatility (17.38%) compared to NFTY (4.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTHF dropped -17.36% vs NFTY's -47.67%.

Which ETF is better, FTHF or NFTY?

On 1-year performance, FTHF leads with 99.98% vs -6.58% for NFTY. On fees, FTHF is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, NFTY has been the lower-risk option at 4.23%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FTHF or NFTY?

Over the 1-year period, FTHF has performed better with a 99.98% return vs -6.58%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FTHF or NFTY?

FTHF is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for NFTY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FTHF or NFTY?

FTHF has the higher dividend yield at 3.03%, compared with 1.91% for NFTY.

What is the main difference between FTHF and NFTY?

FTHF is categorized as Emerging Markets Diversified, while NFTY is Asia Pacific Equities. FTHF tracks Emerging Markets Human Flourishing Index, while NFTY tracks NIFTY 50 Equal Weight Index. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for FTHF and 0.80% for NFTY.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FTHF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.79 vs -0.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.