PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FTHF vs. EMSF
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

FTHF vs. EMSF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Emerging Markets Human Flourishing ETF (FTHF) and Matthews Emerging Markets Sustainable Future Active ETF (EMSF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

FTHF vs. EMSF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
FTHF
First Trust Emerging Markets Human Flourishing ETF
13.15%65.30%-8.14%18.14%
EMSF
Matthews Emerging Markets Sustainable Future Active ETF
9.54%19.20%-3.09%9.01%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FTHF achieves a 13.15% return, which is significantly higher than EMSF's 9.54% return.


FTHF

1D
4.87%
1M
-11.82%
YTD
13.15%
6M
30.54%
1Y
74.58%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

EMSF

1D
4.37%
1M
-9.73%
YTD
9.54%
6M
8.20%
1Y
30.75%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FTHF vs. EMSF - Expense Ratio Comparison

FTHF has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than EMSF's 0.79% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

FTHF vs. EMSF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FTHF
FTHF Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
FTHF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTHF Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTHF Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
FTHF Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTHF Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

EMSF
EMSF Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
EMSF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMSF Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMSF Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
EMSF Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMSF Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FTHF vs. EMSF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Emerging Markets Human Flourishing ETF (FTHF) and Matthews Emerging Markets Sustainable Future Active ETF (EMSF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FTHFEMSFDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.39

1.26

+1.13

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.97

1.74

+1.23

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.50

1.24

+0.26

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.52

2.05

+2.47

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

13.04

6.96

+6.08

FTHF vs. EMSF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FTHF Sharpe Ratio is 2.39, which is higher than the EMSF Sharpe Ratio of 1.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FTHF and EMSF, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FTHFEMSFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.39

1.26

+1.13

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.42

0.49

+0.93

Correlation

The correlation between FTHF and EMSF is 0.77, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

FTHF vs. EMSF - Dividend Comparison

FTHF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.98%, more than EMSF's 1.72% yield.


Drawdowns

FTHF vs. EMSF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTHF drawdown since its inception was -17.36%, smaller than the maximum EMSF drawdown of -24.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTHF and EMSF.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


FTHFEMSFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.36%

-24.75%

+7.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.31%

-14.57%

-1.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.23%

-10.83%

-1.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.33%

-5.96%

+1.63%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.65%

4.29%

+1.36%

Volatility

FTHF vs. EMSF - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Emerging Markets Human Flourishing ETF (FTHF) has a higher volatility of 15.47% compared to Matthews Emerging Markets Sustainable Future Active ETF (EMSF) at 12.64%. This indicates that FTHF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EMSF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


FTHFEMSFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.47%

12.64%

+2.83%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.68%

19.40%

+1.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

31.44%

24.55%

+6.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.24%

21.79%

+2.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.24%

21.79%

+2.45%