FTGT.DE vs. ASRM.DE

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

FTGT.DE (First Trust Alerian Disruptive Technology Real Estate UCITS ETF Acc) and ASRM.DE (BNP Paribas Easy FTSE EPRA Nareit Global Developed Green CTB UCITS ETF) are both REIT funds - FTGT.DE tracks the Alerian Disruptive Technology Real Estate while ASRM.DE tracks the FTSE EPRA Nareit Developed Green EU CTB. Both are passively managed. At a correlation of -0.01, they often move in opposite directions. FTGT.DE charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for ASRM.DE.

Performance

FTGT.DE vs. ASRM.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in First Trust Alerian Disruptive Technology Real Estate UCITS ETF Acc (FTGT.DE) and BNP Paribas Easy FTSE EPRA Nareit Global Developed Green CTB UCITS ETF (ASRM.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

FTGT.DE

• 1D: -0.11%
• 1M: -0.54%
• YTD: 8.42%
• 6M: 8.07%
• 1Y: 6.92%
• 3Y*: 1.37%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ASRM.DE

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FTGT.DE vs. ASRM.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
FTGT.DE First Trust Alerian Disruptive Technology Real Estate UCITS ETF Acc	8.42%	-4.41%	-6.32%	9.64%	-24.17%
ASRM.DE BNP Paribas Easy FTSE EPRA Nareit Global Developed Green CTB UCITS ETF	0.00%	0.00%	-78.40%	-3.99%	0.31%

Correlation

The correlation between FTGT.DE and ASRM.DE is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.03
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.03
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 18, 2022	-0.01

Return for Risk

FTGT.DE vs. ASRM.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FTGT.DE

FTGT.DE Risk / Return Rank: 19
FTGT.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 18
FTGT.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 18
FTGT.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 17
FTGT.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 21
FTGT.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 20

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FTGT.DE vs. ASRM.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Alerian Disruptive Technology Real Estate UCITS ETF Acc (FTGT.DE) and BNP Paribas Easy FTSE EPRA Nareit Global Developed Green CTB UCITS ETF (ASRM.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FTGT.DE	ASRM.DE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.56	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.86	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.10	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.94	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.19	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FTGT.DE	ASRM.DE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.56	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.30	—	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	FTGT.DE	ASRM.DE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.54%	—	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.38%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-20.84%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-20.84%	—	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-22.36%	—	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.18%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	FTGT.DE	ASRM.DE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.62%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.99%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.47%	—	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.51%	—	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.51%	—	—

FTGT.DE vs. ASRM.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

FTGT.DE has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than ASRM.DE's 0.40% expense ratio.

Dividends

FTGT.DE vs. ASRM.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither FTGT.DE nor ASRM.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FTGT.DE and ASRM.DE in my portfolio?

FTGT.DE and ASRM.DE have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, FTGT.DE or ASRM.DE?

On fees, ASRM.DE is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, FTGT.DE or ASRM.DE?

ASRM.DE is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for FTGT.DE.

What is the main difference between FTGT.DE and ASRM.DE?

FTGT.DE tracks Alerian Disruptive Technology Real Estate, while ASRM.DE tracks FTSE EPRA Nareit Developed Green EU CTB. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and BNP Paribas. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for FTGT.DE and 0.40% for ASRM.DE.