PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FTGQ.DE vs. QQQY.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FTGQ.DE vs. QQQY.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in First Trust Vest Nasdaq-100 Moderate Buffer UCITS ETF December Class A Accumulation (FTGQ.DE) and IncomeShares Nasdaq 100 Options(0DTE)ETP EUR (QQQY.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FTGQ.DE achieves a 7.60% return, which is significantly lower than QQQY.DE's 16.00% return.


FTGQ.DE

1D
-0.17%
1M
2.82%
YTD
7.60%
6M
7.43%
1Y
16.10%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

QQQY.DE

1D
-0.69%
1M
7.04%
YTD
16.00%
6M
15.01%
1Y
29.21%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FTGQ.DE vs. QQQY.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between FTGQ.DE and QQQY.DE is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.71

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 27, 2024

0.61

The correlation between FTGQ.DE and QQQY.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.61 (all time) to 0.71 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FTGQ.DE vs. QQQY.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FTGQ.DE
FTGQ.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
FTGQ.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTGQ.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTGQ.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
FTGQ.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTGQ.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQY.DE
QQQY.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
QQQY.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQY.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQY.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQY.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQY.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FTGQ.DE vs. QQQY.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Vest Nasdaq-100 Moderate Buffer UCITS ETF December Class A Accumulation (FTGQ.DE) and IncomeShares Nasdaq 100 Options(0DTE)ETP EUR (QQQY.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FTGQ.DEQQQY.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.70

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.82

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.35

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.23

1.81

+2.42

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.47

3.02

+8.45

FTGQ.DE vs. QQQY.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FTGQ.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.86, which is higher than the QQQY.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FTGQ.DE and QQQY.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FTGQ.DEQQQY.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.86

1.16

+0.70

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.25

0.48

-0.24

Drawdowns

FTGQ.DE vs. QQQY.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTGQ.DE drawdown since its inception was -19.13%, smaller than the maximum QQQY.DE drawdown of -25.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTGQ.DE and QQQY.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FTGQ.DEQQQY.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.13%

-25.57%

+6.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.80%

-16.34%

+12.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.17%

-1.03%

+0.86%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.88%

-10.47%

+4.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.41%

9.83%

-8.42%

Volatility

FTGQ.DE vs. QQQY.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Vest Nasdaq-100 Moderate Buffer UCITS ETF December Class A Accumulation (FTGQ.DE) is 1.30%, while IncomeShares Nasdaq 100 Options(0DTE)ETP EUR (QQQY.DE) has a volatility of 3.94%. This indicates that FTGQ.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQY.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FTGQ.DEQQQY.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.30%

3.94%

-2.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.09%

9.18%

-4.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.64%

25.46%

-16.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.69%

27.58%

-14.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.69%

27.58%

-14.89%

FTGQ.DE vs. QQQY.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

FTGQ.DE has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQY.DE's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

FTGQ.DE vs. QQQY.DE - Dividend Comparison

FTGQ.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QQQY.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 67.30%.


Frequently Asked Questions


FTGQ.DE and QQQY.DE have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, QQQY.DE is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

QQQY.DE is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for FTGQ.DE.

They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.90% for FTGQ.DE and 0.45% for QQQY.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FTGQ.DE and QQQY.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer