FTGQ.DE vs. NQSE.DE
FTGQ.DE (First Trust Vest Nasdaq-100 Moderate Buffer UCITS ETF December Class A Accumulation) and NQSE.DE (iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF) are both Nasdaq-100 funds. FTGQ.DE is actively managed, while NQSE.DE is passively managed. Over the past year, FTGQ.DE returned 16.10% vs 35.67% for NQSE.DE. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FTGQ.DE charges 0.90%/yr vs 0.33%/yr for NQSE.DE.
Performance
FTGQ.DE vs. NQSE.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FTGQ.DE achieves a 7.60% return, which is significantly lower than NQSE.DE's 17.82% return.
FTGQ.DE
- 1D
- -0.17%
- 1M
- 2.82%
- YTD
- 7.60%
- 6M
- 7.43%
- 1Y
- 16.10%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NQSE.DE
- 1D
- -0.77%
- 1M
- 6.66%
- YTD
- 17.82%
- 6M
- 17.09%
- 1Y
- 35.67%
- 3Y*
- 25.27%
- 5Y*
- 14.91%
- 10Y*
- —
FTGQ.DE vs. NQSE.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
FTGQ.DE First Trust Vest Nasdaq-100 Moderate Buffer UCITS ETF December Class A Accumulation | 7.60% | 1.05% | -3.86% |
NQSE.DE iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF | 17.82% | 18.16% | -0.56% |
Correlation
The correlation between FTGQ.DE and NQSE.DE is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 27, 2024 | 0.52 |
The correlation between FTGQ.DE and NQSE.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.52 to 0.54 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FTGQ.DE vs. NQSE.DE — Risk / Return Rank
FTGQ.DE
NQSE.DE
FTGQ.DE vs. NQSE.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Vest Nasdaq-100 Moderate Buffer UCITS ETF December Class A Accumulation (FTGQ.DE) and iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (NQSE.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FTGQ.DE | NQSE.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.42 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.55 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.39 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.23 | 3.08 | +1.15 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.47 | 10.77 | +0.70 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FTGQ.DE | NQSE.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.86 | 2.28 | -0.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.71 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.25 | 0.82 | -0.57 |
Drawdowns
FTGQ.DE vs. NQSE.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FTGQ.DE drawdown since its inception was -19.13%, smaller than the maximum NQSE.DE drawdown of -37.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTGQ.DE and NQSE.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FTGQ.DE | NQSE.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.13% | -37.67% | +18.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.80% | -11.87% | +8.07% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -22.40% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -37.67% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.17% | -0.84% | +0.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.88% | -8.56% | +2.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.41% | 3.40% | -1.99% |
Volatility
FTGQ.DE vs. NQSE.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for First Trust Vest Nasdaq-100 Moderate Buffer UCITS ETF December Class A Accumulation (FTGQ.DE) is 1.30%, while iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (NQSE.DE) has a volatility of 4.75%. This indicates that FTGQ.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NQSE.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FTGQ.DE | NQSE.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.30% | 4.75% | -3.45% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.09% | 11.99% | -6.90% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.64% | 16.05% | -7.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.69% | 20.91% | -8.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.69% | 21.54% | -8.85% |
FTGQ.DE vs. NQSE.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
FTGQ.DE has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than NQSE.DE's 0.33% expense ratio.
Dividends
FTGQ.DE vs. NQSE.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither FTGQ.DE nor NQSE.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
FTGQ.DE and NQSE.DE have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, NQSE.DE is cheaper at 0.33% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
NQSE.DE is cheaper with a 0.33% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for FTGQ.DE.
They also come from different issuers: First Trust and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.90% for FTGQ.DE and 0.33% for NQSE.DE.
Find the right allocation for FTGQ.DE and NQSE.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer