FTGQ.DE vs. EQQX.DE
FTGQ.DE (First Trust Vest Nasdaq-100 Moderate Buffer UCITS ETF December Class A Accumulation) and EQQX.DE (Invesco Nasdaq-100 Swap UCITS ETF Acc) are both Nasdaq-100 funds. FTGQ.DE is actively managed, while EQQX.DE is passively managed. Over the past year, FTGQ.DE returned 16.15% vs 38.41% for EQQX.DE. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FTGQ.DE charges 0.90%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for EQQX.DE.
Performance
FTGQ.DE vs. EQQX.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FTGQ.DE achieves a 7.60% return, which is significantly lower than EQQX.DE's 21.61% return.
FTGQ.DE
- 1D
- -0.17%
- 1M
- 2.82%
- YTD
- 7.60%
- 6M
- 7.77%
- 1Y
- 16.15%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EQQX.DE
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- 8.86%
- YTD
- 21.61%
- 6M
- 19.72%
- 1Y
- 38.41%
- 3Y*
- 25.43%
- 5Y*
- 19.11%
- 10Y*
- —
FTGQ.DE vs. EQQX.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
FTGQ.DE First Trust Vest Nasdaq-100 Moderate Buffer UCITS ETF December Class A Accumulation | 7.60% | 1.05% | -3.86% |
EQQX.DE Invesco Nasdaq-100 Swap UCITS ETF Acc | 21.61% | 7.13% | -0.94% |
Correlation
The correlation between FTGQ.DE and EQQX.DE is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 27, 2024 | 0.76 |
The correlation between FTGQ.DE and EQQX.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FTGQ.DE vs. EQQX.DE — Risk / Return Rank
FTGQ.DE
EQQX.DE
FTGQ.DE vs. EQQX.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Vest Nasdaq-100 Moderate Buffer UCITS ETF December Class A Accumulation (FTGQ.DE) and Invesco Nasdaq-100 Swap UCITS ETF Acc (EQQX.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FTGQ.DE | EQQX.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.63 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.67 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.44 | -0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.23 | 3.91 | +0.32 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.47 | 11.64 | -0.18 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FTGQ.DE | EQQX.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.86 | 2.49 | -0.63 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.95 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.25 | 0.90 | -0.65 |
Drawdowns
FTGQ.DE vs. EQQX.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FTGQ.DE drawdown since its inception was -19.13%, smaller than the maximum EQQX.DE drawdown of -31.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTGQ.DE and EQQX.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FTGQ.DE | EQQX.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.13% | -31.17% | +12.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.80% | -9.97% | +6.17% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -26.80% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -31.17% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.17% | 0.00% | -0.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.88% | -7.99% | +2.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.41% | 3.36% | -1.95% |
Volatility
FTGQ.DE vs. EQQX.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for First Trust Vest Nasdaq-100 Moderate Buffer UCITS ETF December Class A Accumulation (FTGQ.DE) is 1.30%, while Invesco Nasdaq-100 Swap UCITS ETF Acc (EQQX.DE) has a volatility of 4.15%. This indicates that FTGQ.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EQQX.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FTGQ.DE | EQQX.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.30% | 4.15% | -2.85% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.09% | 10.89% | -5.80% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.64% | 15.75% | -7.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.69% | 19.86% | -7.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.69% | 19.79% | -7.10% |
FTGQ.DE vs. EQQX.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
FTGQ.DE has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than EQQX.DE's 0.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
FTGQ.DE vs. EQQX.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither FTGQ.DE nor EQQX.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
FTGQ.DE and EQQX.DE have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, EQQX.DE is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EQQX.DE is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for FTGQ.DE.
They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.90% for FTGQ.DE and 0.20% for EQQX.DE.
Find the right allocation for FTGQ.DE and EQQX.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer