PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FTGC vs. STAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FTGC vs. STAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Global Tactical Commodity Strategy Fund (FTGC) and Macquarie Tax-Free USA Short Term ETF (STAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FTGC achieves a 27.22% return, which is significantly higher than STAX's 1.05% return.


FTGC

1D
0.03%
1M
6.75%
6M
16.44%
YTD
27.22%
1Y
39.60%
3Y*
14.53%
5Y*
12.93%
10Y*
8.01%
ALL TIME*
3.31%

STAX

1D
-0.01%
1M
-0.54%
6M
0.27%
YTD
1.05%
1Y
2.29%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
3.42%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$15.55M$14.47M$23.37M
$56.10K$67.88K$173.24K

FTGC vs. STAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
FTGC
First Trust Global Tactical Commodity Strategy Fund
27.22%14.61%9.96%-3.28%
STAX
Macquarie Tax-Free USA Short Term ETF
1.05%4.12%2.55%1.39%

Correlation

The correlation between FTGC and STAX is -0.27, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.27

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 29, 2023

-0.16

The correlation between FTGC and STAX shifts across timeframes, from -0.27 (1 year) to -0.16 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FTGC vs. STAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FTGC
FTGC Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
FTGC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTGC Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTGC Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
FTGC Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTGC Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

STAX
STAX Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
STAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
STAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
STAX Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
STAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
STAX Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FTGC vs. STAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Global Tactical Commodity Strategy Fund (FTGC) and Macquarie Tax-Free USA Short Term ETF (STAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FTGCSTAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.31

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.52

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.14

2.47

+0.67

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.32

7.48

+2.84

FTGC vs. STAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FTGC Sharpe Ratio is 2.44, which is comparable to the STAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FTGC and STAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FTGC vs. STAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTGC drawdown since its inception was -59.47%, which is greater than STAX's maximum drawdown of -1.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTGC and STAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FTGCSTAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.47%

-1.42%

-58.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.34%

-1.05%

-11.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.64%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.60%

-0.54%

-4.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-27.17%

-0.23%

-26.94%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.75%

0.35%

+3.40%

Volatility

FTGC vs. STAX - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Global Tactical Commodity Strategy Fund (FTGC) has a higher volatility of 4.34% compared to Macquarie Tax-Free USA Short Term ETF (STAX) at 0.41%. This indicates that FTGC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than STAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FTGCSTAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.34%

0.41%

+3.93%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.35%

0.94%

+12.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.87%

1.13%

+14.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.71%

1.39%

+14.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.73%

1.39%

+13.34%

FTGC vs. STAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FTGC has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than STAX's 0.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

FTGC vs. STAX - Dividend Comparison

FTGC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.23%, more than STAX's 3.18% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
FTGC
First Trust Global Tactical Commodity Strategy Fund
15.23%17.74%3.05%3.34%10.35%7.21%0.00%0.81%0.80%1.21%
STAX
Macquarie Tax-Free USA Short Term ETF
3.18%3.16%3.43%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FTGC and STAX have a correlation of -0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FTGC has higher volatility (4.34%) compared to STAX (0.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTGC dropped -59.47% vs STAX's -1.42%.

On 1-year performance, FTGC leads with 39.60% vs 2.29% for STAX. On fees, STAX is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, STAX has been the lower-risk option at 0.41%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, FTGC has performed better with a 39.60% return vs 2.29%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

STAX is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for FTGC.

FTGC has the higher dividend yield at 15.23%, compared with 3.18% for STAX.

FTGC is categorized as Commodities, while STAX is Municipal Bonds. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Macquarie. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for FTGC and 0.29% for STAX.

FTGC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.44 vs 2.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FTGC and STAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer