PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FTGC vs. JAAA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FTGC vs. JAAA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Global Tactical Commodity Strategy Fund (FTGC) and Janus Henderson AAA CLO ETF (JAAA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FTGC achieves a 23.51% return, which is significantly higher than JAAA's 1.95% return.


FTGC

1D
-0.03%
1M
-4.09%
YTD
23.51%
6M
23.08%
1Y
35.61%
3Y*
16.53%
5Y*
12.36%
10Y*
7.34%

JAAA

1D
0.02%
1M
0.35%
YTD
1.95%
6M
2.57%
1Y
5.12%
3Y*
6.67%
5Y*
4.80%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FTGC vs. JAAA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
FTGC
First Trust Global Tactical Commodity Strategy Fund
23.51%14.61%9.96%-5.36%17.36%27.95%11.12%
JAAA
Janus Henderson AAA CLO ETF
1.95%5.16%7.43%8.59%0.49%1.39%0.79%

Correlation

The correlation between FTGC and JAAA is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.02

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.01

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.04

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2020

0.04

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FTGC vs. JAAA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FTGC
FTGC Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
FTGC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTGC Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTGC Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
FTGC Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTGC Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

JAAA
JAAA Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
JAAA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JAAA Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
JAAA Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
JAAA Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
JAAA Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FTGC vs. JAAA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Global Tactical Commodity Strategy Fund (FTGC) and Janus Henderson AAA CLO ETF (JAAA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FTGCJAAADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.88

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-7.34

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

2.77

-1.37

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.52

13.24

-8.71

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.31

71.21

-56.90

FTGC vs. JAAA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FTGC Sharpe Ratio is 2.27, which is lower than the JAAA Sharpe Ratio of 6.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FTGC and JAAA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FTGCJAAADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.27

6.15

-3.88

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

2.88

-2.10

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.22

2.78

-2.56

Drawdowns

FTGC vs. JAAA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTGC drawdown since its inception was -59.47%, which is greater than JAAA's maximum drawdown of -2.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTGC and JAAA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FTGCJAAADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.47%

-2.64%

-56.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.91%

-0.39%

-7.52%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.39%

-1.46%

-8.93%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.64%

-2.64%

-20.00%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.38%

0.00%

-7.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-27.40%

-0.25%

-27.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.50%

0.07%

+2.43%

Volatility

FTGC vs. JAAA - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Global Tactical Commodity Strategy Fund (FTGC) has a higher volatility of 4.76% compared to Janus Henderson AAA CLO ETF (JAAA) at 0.13%. This indicates that FTGC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JAAA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FTGCJAAADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.76%

0.13%

+4.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.37%

0.64%

+12.73%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.78%

0.84%

+14.94%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.97%

1.68%

+14.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.72%

1.64%

+13.08%

FTGC vs. JAAA - Expense Ratio Comparison

FTGC has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than JAAA's 0.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

FTGC vs. JAAA - Dividend Comparison

FTGC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.52%, more than JAAA's 4.99% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
FTGC
First Trust Global Tactical Commodity Strategy Fund
15.52%17.74%3.05%3.34%10.35%7.21%0.00%0.81%0.80%1.21%
JAAA
Janus Henderson AAA CLO ETF
4.99%5.30%6.35%6.11%2.74%1.21%0.26%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FTGC and JAAA have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FTGC has higher volatility (4.76%) compared to JAAA (0.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTGC dropped -59.47% vs JAAA's -2.64%.

On 5-year performance, FTGC leads with 12.36% vs 4.80% for JAAA. On fees, JAAA is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, JAAA has been the lower-risk option at 0.13%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FTGC has performed better with a 12.36% return vs 4.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

JAAA is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for FTGC.

FTGC has the higher dividend yield at 15.52%, compared with 4.99% for JAAA.

FTGC is categorized as Commodities, while JAAA is CLO. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Janus Henderson. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for FTGC and 0.20% for JAAA.

JAAA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.15 vs 2.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FTGC and JAAA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer