PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FTGC vs. BNDI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FTGC vs. BNDI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Global Tactical Commodity Strategy Fund (FTGC) and Neos Enhanced Income Aggregate Bond ETF (BNDI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FTGC achieves a 24.40% return, which is significantly higher than BNDI's 0.97% return.


FTGC

1D
1.00%
1M
2.09%
6M
20.91%
YTD
24.40%
1Y
32.56%
3Y*
14.94%
5Y*
12.87%
10Y*
7.52%

BNDI

1D
-0.31%
1M
-0.52%
6M
0.72%
YTD
0.97%
1Y
5.62%
3Y*
4.68%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FTGC vs. BNDI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
FTGC
First Trust Global Tactical Commodity Strategy Fund
24.40%14.61%9.96%-5.36%-2.54%
BNDI
Neos Enhanced Income Aggregate Bond ETF
0.97%7.95%1.74%6.89%-2.88%

Correlation

The correlation between FTGC and BNDI is -0.25, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.25

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.08

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 30, 2022

-0.03

Over the past year, the inverse relationship between FTGC and BNDI has strengthened: their correlation has moved from -0.03 to -0.25, meaning they now move in opposite directions more often than their long-term average.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FTGC vs. BNDI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FTGC
FTGC Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
FTGC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTGC Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTGC Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
FTGC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTGC Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

BNDI
BNDI Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
BNDI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BNDI Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
BNDI Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
BNDI Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
BNDI Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FTGC vs. BNDI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Global Tactical Commodity Strategy Fund (FTGC) and Neos Enhanced Income Aggregate Bond ETF (BNDI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FTGCBNDIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.72

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.75

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.24

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.65

2.05

+0.60

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.90

7.29

+1.61

FTGC vs. BNDI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FTGC Sharpe Ratio is 2.08, which is higher than the BNDI Sharpe Ratio of 1.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FTGC and BNDI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FTGC vs. BNDI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTGC drawdown since its inception was -59.47%, which is greater than BNDI's maximum drawdown of -7.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTGC and BNDI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FTGCBNDIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.47%

-7.25%

-52.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.34%

-2.75%

-9.59%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.34%

-5.83%

-6.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.64%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.71%

-1.29%

-5.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-27.27%

-1.71%

-25.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.67%

0.77%

+2.90%

Volatility

FTGC vs. BNDI - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Global Tactical Commodity Strategy Fund (FTGC) has a higher volatility of 4.23% compared to Neos Enhanced Income Aggregate Bond ETF (BNDI) at 1.49%. This indicates that FTGC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BNDI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FTGCBNDIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.23%

1.49%

+2.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.37%

3.38%

+9.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.77%

4.17%

+11.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.87%

6.16%

+9.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.72%

6.16%

+8.56%

FTGC vs. BNDI - Expense Ratio Comparison

FTGC has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than BNDI's 0.58% expense ratio.


Dividends

FTGC vs. BNDI - Dividend Comparison

FTGC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.57%, more than BNDI's 5.86% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
BNDI
Neos Enhanced Income Aggregate Bond ETF
5.86%5.69%5.54%5.17%1.68%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FTGC
First Trust Global Tactical Commodity Strategy Fund
15.57%17.74%3.05%3.34%10.35%7.21%0.00%0.81%0.80%1.21%

Frequently Asked Questions


FTGC and BNDI have a correlation of -0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FTGC has higher volatility (4.23%) compared to BNDI (1.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTGC dropped -59.47% vs BNDI's -7.25%.

On 3-year performance, FTGC leads with 14.94% vs 4.68% for BNDI. On fees, BNDI is cheaper at 0.58% per year. On volatility, BNDI has been the lower-risk option at 1.49%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, FTGC has performed better with a 14.94% return vs 4.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BNDI is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for FTGC.

FTGC has the higher dividend yield at 15.57%, compared with 5.86% for BNDI.

FTGC is categorized as Commodities, while BNDI is Intermediate Core-Plus Bond. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Neos. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for FTGC and 0.58% for BNDI.

FTGC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.08 vs 1.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FTGC and BNDI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer