PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FTGC vs. AVGB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FTGC vs. AVGB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Global Tactical Commodity Strategy Fund (FTGC) and Avantis Credit ETF (AVGB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FTGC achieves a 27.72% return, which is significantly higher than AVGB's 0.87% return.


FTGC

1D
0.19%
1M
-1.35%
YTD
27.72%
6M
27.09%
1Y
42.24%
3Y*
18.31%
5Y*
13.62%
10Y*
7.82%

AVGB

1D
0.03%
1M
0.47%
YTD
0.87%
6M
1.12%
1Y
4.82%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FTGC vs. AVGB - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between FTGC and AVGB is -0.28, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.28

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 21, 2025

-0.27

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FTGC vs. AVGB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FTGC
FTGC Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
FTGC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTGC Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTGC Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
FTGC Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTGC Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

AVGB
AVGB Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
AVGB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AVGB Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
AVGB Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
AVGB Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
AVGB Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FTGC vs. AVGB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Global Tactical Commodity Strategy Fund (FTGC) and Avantis Credit ETF (AVGB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FTGCAVGBDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.72

1.96

+0.77

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.50

2.91

+0.59

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.37

+0.11

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

5.70

2.24

+3.46

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

19.06

8.36

+10.71

FTGC vs. AVGB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FTGC Sharpe Ratio is 2.72, which is higher than the AVGB Sharpe Ratio of 1.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FTGC and AVGB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FTGCAVGBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.72

1.96

+0.77

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.53

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.24

2.09

-1.85

Drawdowns

FTGC vs. AVGB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTGC drawdown since its inception was -59.47%, which is greater than AVGB's maximum drawdown of -2.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTGC and AVGB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FTGCAVGBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.47%

-2.12%

-57.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.91%

-2.12%

-5.79%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.64%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.22%

-0.34%

-3.88%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-27.43%

-0.33%

-27.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.37%

0.57%

+1.80%

Volatility

FTGC vs. AVGB - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Global Tactical Commodity Strategy Fund (FTGC) has a higher volatility of 4.59% compared to Avantis Credit ETF (AVGB) at 0.87%. This indicates that FTGC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AVGB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FTGCAVGBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.59%

0.87%

+3.72%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.14%

1.92%

+11.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.69%

2.48%

+13.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.02%

2.49%

+13.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.71%

2.49%

+12.22%

FTGC vs. AVGB - Expense Ratio Comparison

FTGC has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than AVGB's 0.19% expense ratio.


Dividends

FTGC vs. AVGB - Dividend Comparison

FTGC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.01%, more than AVGB's 3.46% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
AVGB
Avantis Credit ETF
3.46%3.49%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FTGC
First Trust Global Tactical Commodity Strategy Fund
15.01%17.74%3.05%3.34%10.35%7.21%0.00%0.81%0.80%1.21%

Frequently Asked Questions


FTGC and AVGB have a correlation of -0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FTGC has higher volatility (4.59%) compared to AVGB (0.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTGC dropped -59.47% vs AVGB's -2.12%.

On 1-year performance, FTGC leads with 42.24% vs 4.82% for AVGB. On fees, AVGB is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, AVGB has been the lower-risk option at 0.87%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, FTGC has performed better with a 42.24% return vs 4.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

AVGB is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for FTGC.

FTGC has the higher dividend yield at 15.01%, compared with 3.46% for AVGB.

FTGC is categorized as Commodities, while AVGB is Global Bonds. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Avantis. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for FTGC and 0.19% for AVGB.

FTGC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.72 vs 1.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FTGC and AVGB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer