FTG.TO vs. CIGI.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about Firan Technology Group Corporation (FTG.TO) and Colliers International Group Inc. (CIGI.TO).
Performance
FTG.TO vs. CIGI.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FTG.TO vs. CIGI.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTG.TO Firan Technology Group Corporation | 61.30% | 58.44% | 71.53% | 80.85% | -11.32% | 29.27% | -49.63% | 92.89% | -41.55% | -6.23% |
CIGI.TO Colliers International Group Inc. | -26.28% | 3.42% | 16.92% | 35.12% | -33.77% | 66.54% | 12.21% | 34.46% | -0.61% | 53.57% |
Fundamentals
FTG.TO:
CA$468.98M
CIGI.TO:
CA$7.62B
FTG.TO:
CA$0.52
CIGI.TO:
CA$2.25
FTG.TO:
36.13
CIGI.TO:
66.14
FTG.TO:
0.07
CIGI.TO:
2.30
FTG.TO:
2.52
CIGI.TO:
1.23
FTG.TO:
4.86
CIGI.TO:
4.98
FTG.TO:
CA$187.37M
CIGI.TO:
CA$5.58B
FTG.TO:
CA$57.66M
CIGI.TO:
CA$2.10B
FTG.TO:
CA$28.64M
CIGI.TO:
CA$646.26M
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FTG.TO achieves a 61.30% return, which is significantly higher than CIGI.TO's -26.28% return. Over the past 10 years, FTG.TO has outperformed CIGI.TO with an annualized return of 23.76%, while CIGI.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 12.16% annualized return.
FTG.TO
- 1D
- 6.09%
- 1M
- -13.63%
- YTD
- 61.30%
- 6M
- 57.75%
- 1Y
- 150.40%
- 3Y*
- 84.63%
- 5Y*
- 54.59%
- 10Y*
- 23.76%
CIGI.TO
- 1D
- 3.37%
- 1M
- -8.07%
- YTD
- -26.28%
- 6M
- -31.60%
- 1Y
- -14.41%
- 3Y*
- 1.65%
- 5Y*
- 2.50%
- 10Y*
- 12.16%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FTG.TO vs. CIGI.TO — Risk / Return Rank
FTG.TO
CIGI.TO
FTG.TO vs. CIGI.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Firan Technology Group Corporation (FTG.TO) and Colliers International Group Inc. (CIGI.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FTG.TO | CIGI.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 3.27 | -0.43 | +3.70 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.74 | -0.39 | +4.13 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.45 | 0.95 | +0.50 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.43 | -0.32 | +6.75 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.67 | -0.84 | +16.51 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FTG.TO | CIGI.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.27 | -0.43 | +3.70 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.32 | 0.08 | +1.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.54 | 0.36 | +0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.05 | 0.43 | -0.48 |
Correlation
The correlation between FTG.TO and CIGI.TO is 0.04, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
FTG.TO vs. CIGI.TO - Dividend Comparison
FTG.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CIGI.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.28%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTG.TO Firan Technology Group Corporation | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
CIGI.TO Colliers International Group Inc. | 0.28% | 0.20% | 0.21% | 0.24% | 0.32% | 0.13% | 0.12% | 0.13% | 0.18% | 0.17% | 0.27% | 0.40% |
Drawdowns
FTG.TO vs. CIGI.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FTG.TO drawdown since its inception was -99.96%, which is greater than CIGI.TO's maximum drawdown of -75.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTG.TO and CIGI.TO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FTG.TO | CIGI.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.96% | -75.45% | -24.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.58% | -42.07% | +19.49% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -47.21% | -42.07% | -5.14% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -68.78% | -56.62% | -12.16% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -95.95% | -37.00% | -58.95% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -91.05% | -20.80% | -70.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.26% | 16.08% | -6.82% |
Volatility
FTG.TO vs. CIGI.TO - Volatility Comparison
Firan Technology Group Corporation (FTG.TO) has a higher volatility of 16.64% compared to Colliers International Group Inc. (CIGI.TO) at 11.03%. This indicates that FTG.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CIGI.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FTG.TO | CIGI.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.64% | 11.03% | +5.61% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 35.56% | 26.29% | +9.27% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 46.30% | 33.66% | +12.64% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 42.04% | 30.89% | +11.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 44.81% | 34.41% | +10.40% |
Financials
FTG.TO vs. CIGI.TO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Firan Technology Group Corporation and Colliers International Group Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
FTG.TO vs. CIGI.TO - Profitability Comparison
FTG.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Firan Technology Group Corporation reported a gross profit of 11.74M and revenue of 48.03M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 24.4%.
CIGI.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Colliers International Group Inc. reported a gross profit of 524.07M and revenue of 1.63B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 32.1%.
FTG.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Firan Technology Group Corporation reported an operating income of 2.19M and revenue of 48.03M, resulting in an operating margin of 4.6%.
CIGI.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Colliers International Group Inc. reported an operating income of 143.53M and revenue of 1.63B, resulting in an operating margin of 8.8%.
FTG.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Firan Technology Group Corporation reported a net income of 3.66M and revenue of 48.03M, resulting in a net margin of 7.6%.
CIGI.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Colliers International Group Inc. reported a net income of 62.06M and revenue of 1.63B, resulting in a net margin of 3.8%.