CIGI.TO vs. MTL.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about Colliers International Group Inc. (CIGI.TO) and Mullen Group Ltd. (MTL.TO).
Performance
CIGI.TO vs. MTL.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CIGI.TO vs. MTL.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CIGI.TO Colliers International Group Inc. | -26.28% | 3.42% | 16.92% | 35.12% | -33.77% | 66.54% | 12.21% | 34.46% | -0.61% | 53.57% |
MTL.TO Mullen Group Ltd. | 9.42% | 14.66% | 9.57% | 1.51% | 31.70% | 10.96% | 23.04% | -19.32% | -19.13% | -18.83% |
Fundamentals
CIGI.TO:
CA$7.62B
MTL.TO:
CA$2.24B
CIGI.TO:
CA$2.25
MTL.TO:
CA$0.84
CIGI.TO:
66.14
MTL.TO:
20.29
CIGI.TO:
2.30
MTL.TO:
1.01
CIGI.TO:
1.23
MTL.TO:
0.87
CIGI.TO:
4.98
MTL.TO:
1.97
CIGI.TO:
CA$5.58B
MTL.TO:
CA$2.13B
CIGI.TO:
CA$2.10B
MTL.TO:
CA$493.59M
CIGI.TO:
CA$646.26M
MTL.TO:
CA$324.64M
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CIGI.TO achieves a -26.28% return, which is significantly lower than MTL.TO's 9.42% return. Over the past 10 years, CIGI.TO has outperformed MTL.TO with an annualized return of 12.16%, while MTL.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 6.81% annualized return.
CIGI.TO
- 1D
- 3.37%
- 1M
- -8.07%
- YTD
- -26.28%
- 6M
- -31.60%
- 1Y
- -14.41%
- 3Y*
- 1.65%
- 5Y*
- 2.50%
- 10Y*
- 12.16%
MTL.TO
- 1D
- 2.21%
- 1M
- -0.99%
- YTD
- 9.42%
- 6M
- 25.49%
- 1Y
- 44.08%
- 3Y*
- 10.72%
- 5Y*
- 11.49%
- 10Y*
- 6.81%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CIGI.TO vs. MTL.TO — Risk / Return Rank
CIGI.TO
MTL.TO
CIGI.TO vs. MTL.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Colliers International Group Inc. (CIGI.TO) and Mullen Group Ltd. (MTL.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CIGI.TO | MTL.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.43 | 1.86 | -2.29 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.39 | 2.36 | -2.75 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.95 | 1.37 | -0.42 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.32 | 4.75 | -5.08 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.84 | 13.52 | -14.37 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CIGI.TO | MTL.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.43 | 1.86 | -2.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.08 | 0.43 | -0.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.36 | 0.21 | +0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.43 | -0.62 | +1.05 |
Correlation
The correlation between CIGI.TO and MTL.TO is 0.15, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
CIGI.TO vs. MTL.TO - Dividend Comparison
CIGI.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.28%, less than MTL.TO's 4.51% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CIGI.TO Colliers International Group Inc. | 0.28% | 0.20% | 0.21% | 0.24% | 0.32% | 0.13% | 0.12% | 0.13% | 0.18% | 0.17% | 0.27% | 0.40% |
MTL.TO Mullen Group Ltd. | 4.51% | 5.34% | 5.28% | 5.13% | 4.67% | 4.13% | 3.30% | 6.47% | 4.91% | 2.29% | 2.82% | 8.57% |
Drawdowns
CIGI.TO vs. MTL.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CIGI.TO drawdown since its inception was -75.45%, smaller than the maximum MTL.TO drawdown of -100.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CIGI.TO and MTL.TO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CIGI.TO | MTL.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -75.45% | -100.00% | +24.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -42.07% | -9.01% | -33.06% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -42.07% | -21.59% | -20.48% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -56.62% | -77.25% | +20.63% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -37.00% | -99.98% | +62.98% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.80% | -93.11% | +72.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.08% | 3.17% | +12.91% |
Volatility
CIGI.TO vs. MTL.TO - Volatility Comparison
Colliers International Group Inc. (CIGI.TO) has a higher volatility of 11.03% compared to Mullen Group Ltd. (MTL.TO) at 8.52%. This indicates that CIGI.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MTL.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CIGI.TO | MTL.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.03% | 8.52% | +2.51% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.29% | 17.88% | +8.41% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 33.66% | 23.79% | +9.87% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.89% | 26.98% | +3.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 34.41% | 31.96% | +2.45% |
Financials
CIGI.TO vs. MTL.TO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Colliers International Group Inc. and Mullen Group Ltd.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CIGI.TO vs. MTL.TO - Profitability Comparison
CIGI.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Colliers International Group Inc. reported a gross profit of 524.07M and revenue of 1.63B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 32.1%.
MTL.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Mullen Group Ltd. reported a gross profit of 118.62M and revenue of 533.88M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 22.2%.
CIGI.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Colliers International Group Inc. reported an operating income of 143.53M and revenue of 1.63B, resulting in an operating margin of 8.8%.
MTL.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Mullen Group Ltd. reported an operating income of 36.86M and revenue of 533.88M, resulting in an operating margin of 6.9%.
CIGI.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Colliers International Group Inc. reported a net income of 62.06M and revenue of 1.63B, resulting in a net margin of 3.8%.
MTL.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Mullen Group Ltd. reported a net income of 14.61M and revenue of 533.88M, resulting in a net margin of 2.7%.