PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FTF vs. ETSIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FTF vs. ETSIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Limited Duration Income Trust (FTF) and Eaton Vance Strategic Income Fund Class I (ETSIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FTF achieves a -0.19% return, which is significantly lower than ETSIX's 2.46% return. Over the past 10 years, FTF has underperformed ETSIX with an annualized return of 3.74%, while ETSIX has yielded a comparatively higher 4.64% annualized return.


FTF

1D
-0.35%
1M
-0.67%
6M
-1.80%
YTD
-0.19%
1Y
1.07%
3Y*
9.11%
5Y*
1.77%
10Y*
3.74%
ALL TIME*
4.95%

ETSIX

1D
0.27%
1M
-0.46%
6M
1.08%
YTD
2.46%
1Y
7.33%
3Y*
7.90%
5Y*
5.00%
10Y*
4.64%
ALL TIME*
4.86%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$1.09M$1.14M$1.28M

FTF vs. ETSIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FTF
Franklin Limited Duration Income Trust
-0.19%4.16%19.50%12.22%-23.49%6.72%9.01%18.45%-15.28%9.44%
ETSIX
Eaton Vance Strategic Income Fund Class I
2.46%10.88%6.38%8.24%-2.55%1.33%7.52%6.58%-2.68%4.90%

Correlation

The correlation between FTF and ETSIX is 0.40, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.40

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.24

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.24

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.20

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 4, 2003

0.17

Over the past year, FTF and ETSIX have become more correlated (0.40) than their long-term average of 0.17, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FTF vs. ETSIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FTF
FTF Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
FTF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTF Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTF Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
FTF Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTF Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank

ETSIX
ETSIX Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
ETSIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ETSIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
ETSIX Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
ETSIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
ETSIX Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FTF vs. ETSIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Limited Duration Income Trust (FTF) and Eaton Vance Strategic Income Fund Class I (ETSIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FTFETSIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.65

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.78

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.02

1.56

-0.54

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.12

3.36

-3.24

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.30

11.13

-10.83

FTF vs. ETSIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FTF Sharpe Ratio is 0.11, which is lower than the ETSIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FTF and ETSIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FTF vs. ETSIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTF drawdown since its inception was -51.15%, which is greater than ETSIX's maximum drawdown of -12.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTF and ETSIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FTFETSIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.15%

-12.63%

-38.52%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.54%

-2.43%

-4.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.58%

-2.47%

-9.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.55%

-6.34%

-22.21%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.64%

-12.28%

-24.36%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.52%

-0.60%

-1.92%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.00%

-1.43%

-6.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.51%

0.73%

+1.78%

Volatility

FTF vs. ETSIX - Volatility Comparison

Franklin Limited Duration Income Trust (FTF) has a higher volatility of 2.14% compared to Eaton Vance Strategic Income Fund Class I (ETSIX) at 0.94%. This indicates that FTF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ETSIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FTFETSIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.14%

0.94%

+1.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.70%

2.48%

+3.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.17%

2.97%

+4.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.08%

3.26%

+7.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.88%

3.16%

+10.72%

FTF vs. ETSIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FTF has a 3.92% expense ratio, which is higher than ETSIX's 1.46% expense ratio.


Dividends

FTF vs. ETSIX - Dividend Comparison

FTF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.92%, more than ETSIX's 7.17% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ETSIX
Eaton Vance Strategic Income Fund Class I
7.17%5.65%6.97%6.93%5.56%4.31%4.19%4.29%3.98%3.70%3.94%4.32%
FTF
Franklin Limited Duration Income Trust
12.92%12.00%11.13%11.41%12.62%10.26%9.50%10.73%12.37%10.86%6.56%6.94%

Frequently Asked Questions


FTF and ETSIX have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FTF has higher volatility (2.14%) compared to ETSIX (0.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTF dropped -51.15% vs ETSIX's -12.63%.

ETSIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.76 vs 0.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FTF and ETSIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer