PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FTEK.L vs. EQQQ.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FTEK.L vs. EQQQ.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco KBW NASDAQ Fintech UCITS ETF (FTEK.L) and Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF (EQQQ.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

FTEK.L is traded in USD, while EQQQ.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the EQQQ.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FTEK.L achieves a -12.71% return, which is significantly lower than EQQQ.L's 19.56% return.


FTEK.L

1D
3.04%
1M
-5.73%
YTD
-12.71%
6M
-12.95%
1Y
-13.15%
3Y*
12.08%
5Y*
1.34%
10Y*

EQQQ.L

1D
-0.58%
1M
8.70%
YTD
19.56%
6M
19.25%
1Y
40.27%
3Y*
27.86%
5Y*
17.62%
10Y*
21.58%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FTEK.L vs. EQQQ.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FTEK.L
Invesco KBW NASDAQ Fintech UCITS ETF
-12.71%-0.53%33.52%34.99%-32.28%11.05%24.59%34.33%4.14%20.55%
EQQQ.L
Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF
19.56%19.96%26.41%55.59%-33.50%28.41%47.71%39.05%-1.28%20.26%

Correlation

The correlation between FTEK.L and EQQQ.L is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.49

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.54

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 13, 2017

0.67

The correlation between FTEK.L and EQQQ.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.49 (1 year) to 0.67 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FTEK.L vs. EQQQ.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FTEK.L
EQQQ.L

Financial Services

48.1%
0.2%

Industrials

32.9%
2.8%

Technology

16.7%
57.9%

Real Estate

2.2%
0.0%

Communication Services

1.7%
14.5%

Basic Materials

-

1.0%

Consumer Cyclical

-

11.6%

Consumer Defensive

-

6.6%

Energy

-

0.5%

Healthcare

-

3.7%

Utilities

-

1.2%

Financial Services

FTEK.L
48.1%
EQQQ.L
0.2%

Industrials

FTEK.L
32.9%
EQQQ.L
2.8%

Technology

FTEK.L
16.7%
EQQQ.L
57.9%

Real Estate

FTEK.L
2.2%
EQQQ.L
0.0%

Communication Services

FTEK.L
1.7%
EQQQ.L
14.5%

Basic Materials

FTEK.L

-

EQQQ.L
1.0%

Consumer Cyclical

FTEK.L

-

EQQQ.L
11.6%

Consumer Defensive

FTEK.L

-

EQQQ.L
6.6%

Energy

FTEK.L

-

EQQQ.L
0.5%

Healthcare

FTEK.L

-

EQQQ.L
3.7%

Utilities

FTEK.L

-

EQQQ.L
1.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FTEK.L vs. EQQQ.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FTEK.L
FTEK.L Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
FTEK.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTEK.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTEK.L Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
FTEK.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTEK.L Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank

EQQQ.L
EQQQ.L Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
EQQQ.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EQQQ.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
EQQQ.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
EQQQ.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
EQQQ.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FTEK.L vs. EQQQ.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco KBW NASDAQ Fintech UCITS ETF (FTEK.L) and Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF (EQQQ.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FTEK.LEQQQ.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.30

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.91

1.44

-0.53

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.52

3.64

-4.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.03

13.38

-14.41

FTEK.L vs. EQQQ.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FTEK.L Sharpe Ratio is -0.60, which is lower than the EQQQ.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FTEK.L and EQQQ.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FTEK.LEQQQ.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.60

2.61

-3.21

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.06

0.86

-0.80

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.46

0.81

-0.35

Drawdowns

FTEK.L vs. EQQQ.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTEK.L drawdown since its inception was -39.74%, smaller than the maximum EQQQ.L drawdown of -50.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTEK.L and EQQQ.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FTEK.LEQQQ.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.74%

-50.98%

+11.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-25.27%

-11.03%

-14.24%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.27%

-22.63%

-2.64%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.26%

-35.27%

-2.99%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-20.54%

-0.75%

-19.79%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.37%

-7.06%

-3.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.76%

3.00%

+9.76%

Volatility

FTEK.L vs. EQQQ.L - Volatility Comparison

Invesco KBW NASDAQ Fintech UCITS ETF (FTEK.L) has a higher volatility of 8.44% compared to Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF (EQQQ.L) at 4.34%. This indicates that FTEK.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EQQQ.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FTEK.LEQQQ.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.44%

4.34%

+4.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.19%

11.19%

+7.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.83%

15.34%

+6.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.33%

20.50%

+2.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.15%

19.85%

+2.30%

FTEK.L vs. EQQQ.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

FTEK.L has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than EQQQ.L's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

FTEK.L vs. EQQQ.L - Dividend Comparison

FTEK.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EQQQ.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.23%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EQQQ.L
Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF
0.23%0.29%0.38%0.39%0.56%0.25%0.41%0.56%0.63%0.67%0.77%0.72%
FTEK.L
Invesco KBW NASDAQ Fintech UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FTEK.L and EQQQ.L have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, EQQQ.L is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

EQQQ.L is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for FTEK.L.

FTEK.L is categorized as Technology Equities, while EQQQ.L is Nasdaq-100. FTEK.L tracks MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD, while EQQQ.L tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for FTEK.L and 0.30% for EQQQ.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FTEK.L and EQQQ.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer