PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FTCNX vs. FAOAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FTCNX vs. FAOAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Canada Fund Class M (FTCNX) and Fidelity Advisor Overseas Fund Class A (FAOAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

Over the past 10 years, FTCNX has outperformed FAOAX with an annualized return of 9.77%, while FAOAX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.17% annualized return.


FTCNX

1D
-0.26%
1M
0.56%
YTD
6.82%
6M
11.40%
1Y
17.07%
3Y*
16.28%
5Y*
9.84%
10Y*
9.77%

FAOAX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
0.00%
6M
0.00%
1Y
-2.37%
3Y*
8.51%
5Y*
3.29%
10Y*
7.17%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FTCNX vs. FAOAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FTCNX
Fidelity Advisor Canada Fund Class M
6.82%25.18%8.57%14.02%-6.70%26.10%3.82%25.08%-14.85%12.87%
FAOAX
Fidelity Advisor Overseas Fund Class A
0.00%14.93%4.63%20.01%-24.61%18.90%14.71%27.39%-15.10%29.66%

Correlation

The correlation between FTCNX and FAOAX is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.34

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.62

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 11, 2007

0.73

Over the past year, the correlation between FTCNX and FAOAX has dropped to 0.34 - well below their long-term average of 0.73, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FTCNX vs. FAOAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FTCNX
FTCNX Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
FTCNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTCNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTCNX Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
FTCNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTCNX Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank

FAOAX
FAOAX Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
FAOAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FAOAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
FAOAX Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
FAOAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
FAOAX Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FTCNX vs. FAOAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Canada Fund Class M (FTCNX) and Fidelity Advisor Overseas Fund Class A (FAOAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FTCNXFAOAXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.46

-0.20

+1.66

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.02

-0.21

+2.23

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

0.97

+0.29

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.49

1.21

+1.28

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.22

2.22

+5.99

FTCNX vs. FAOAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FTCNX Sharpe Ratio is 1.46, which is higher than the FAOAX Sharpe Ratio of -0.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FTCNX and FAOAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FTCNXFAOAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.46

-0.20

+1.66

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.62

0.20

+0.42

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

0.44

+0.13

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.27

0.30

-0.03

Drawdowns

FTCNX vs. FAOAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTCNX drawdown since its inception was -58.27%, roughly equal to the maximum FAOAX drawdown of -60.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTCNX and FAOAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FTCNXFAOAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.27%

-60.03%

+1.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.65%

-7.29%

-0.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.23%

-13.99%

+1.76%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.21%

-36.50%

+15.29%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.92%

-36.50%

-3.42%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.49%

-5.87%

+4.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.40%

-14.56%

+2.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.32%

3.96%

-1.64%

Volatility

FTCNX vs. FAOAX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Canada Fund Class M (FTCNX) has a higher volatility of 2.67% compared to Fidelity Advisor Overseas Fund Class A (FAOAX) at 0.00%. This indicates that FTCNX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FAOAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FTCNXFAOAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.67%

0.00%

+2.67%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.86%

4.08%

+5.78%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.53%

9.20%

+3.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.95%

16.72%

-0.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.43%

16.69%

+0.74%

FTCNX vs. FAOAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FTCNX has a 1.40% expense ratio, which is lower than FAOAX's 1.43% expense ratio.


Dividends

FTCNX vs. FAOAX - Dividend Comparison

FTCNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.80%, less than FAOAX's 8.54% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FAOAX
Fidelity Advisor Overseas Fund Class A
8.54%8.54%1.33%0.74%0.38%2.12%0.00%1.37%4.64%3.64%1.75%0.38%
FTCNX
Fidelity Advisor Canada Fund Class M
4.80%5.13%6.90%2.83%3.47%4.58%1.99%3.89%6.55%0.90%1.08%0.15%

Frequently Asked Questions


FTCNX and FAOAX have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FTCNX has higher volatility (2.67%) compared to FAOAX (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTCNX dropped -58.27% vs FAOAX's -60.03%.

FTCNX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.46 vs -0.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FTCNX and FAOAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer