PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FTCNX vs. BDOKX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FTCNX vs. BDOKX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Canada Fund Class M (FTCNX) and iShares MSCI Total International Index Fund Class K (BDOKX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FTCNX achieves a 9.66% return, which is significantly lower than BDOKX's 13.69% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FTCNX having a 9.90% annualized return and BDOKX not far behind at 9.42%.


FTCNX

1D
0.37%
1M
4.14%
6M
9.73%
YTD
9.66%
1Y
20.30%
3Y*
15.36%
5Y*
10.70%
10Y*
9.90%
ALL TIME*
5.77%

BDOKX

1D
2.96%
1M
0.41%
6M
7.65%
YTD
13.69%
1Y
29.15%
3Y*
17.11%
5Y*
8.92%
10Y*
9.42%
ALL TIME*
6.34%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

FTCNX vs. BDOKX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FTCNX
Fidelity Advisor Canada Fund Class M
9.66%25.18%8.57%14.02%-6.70%26.10%3.82%25.08%-14.85%12.87%
BDOKX
iShares MSCI Total International Index Fund Class K
13.69%32.56%5.37%15.26%-16.40%7.68%10.77%23.11%-13.91%26.40%

Correlation

The correlation between FTCNX and BDOKX is 0.57, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.57

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.70

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.76

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2011

0.78

Over the past year, the correlation between FTCNX and BDOKX has dropped to 0.57 - well below their long-term average of 0.78, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FTCNX vs. BDOKX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FTCNX
FTCNX Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
FTCNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTCNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTCNX Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
FTCNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTCNX Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

BDOKX
BDOKX Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
BDOKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BDOKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
BDOKX Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
BDOKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
BDOKX Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FTCNX vs. BDOKX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Canada Fund Class M (FTCNX) and iShares MSCI Total International Index Fund Class K (BDOKX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FTCNXBDOKXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.31

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.31

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.45

2.42

+0.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.67

8.97

-1.30

FTCNX vs. BDOKX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FTCNX Sharpe Ratio is 1.46, which is comparable to the BDOKX Sharpe Ratio of 1.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FTCNX and BDOKX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FTCNX vs. BDOKX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTCNX drawdown since its inception was -58.27%, which is greater than BDOKX's maximum drawdown of -34.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTCNX and BDOKX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FTCNXBDOKXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.27%

-34.22%

-24.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.65%

-11.38%

+3.73%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.23%

-13.54%

+1.31%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.21%

-30.00%

+8.79%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.92%

-34.22%

-5.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-2.52%

+2.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.30%

-8.17%

-4.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.44%

3.06%

-0.62%

Volatility

FTCNX vs. BDOKX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor Canada Fund Class M (FTCNX) is 2.33%, while iShares MSCI Total International Index Fund Class K (BDOKX) has a volatility of 5.66%. This indicates that FTCNX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BDOKX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FTCNXBDOKXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.33%

5.66%

-3.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.21%

14.69%

-4.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.88%

16.61%

-3.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.90%

15.81%

+0.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.35%

16.18%

+1.17%

FTCNX vs. BDOKX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FTCNX has a 1.40% expense ratio, which is higher than BDOKX's 0.09% expense ratio.


Dividends

FTCNX vs. BDOKX - Dividend Comparison

FTCNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.68%, more than BDOKX's 2.58% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BDOKX
iShares MSCI Total International Index Fund Class K
2.58%3.01%2.84%2.94%2.84%3.01%1.98%4.48%3.28%1.81%3.51%3.87%
FTCNX
Fidelity Advisor Canada Fund Class M
4.68%5.13%6.90%2.83%3.47%4.58%1.99%3.89%6.55%0.90%1.08%0.15%

Frequently Asked Questions


FTCNX and BDOKX have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BDOKX has higher volatility (5.66%) compared to FTCNX (2.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTCNX dropped -58.27% vs BDOKX's -34.22%.

BDOKX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.66 vs 1.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FTCNX and BDOKX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer