FTCB vs. CAFX
FTCB (First Trust Core Investment Grade ETF) and CAFX (Congress Intermediate Bond ETF) are both Intermediate Core Bond funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, FTCB returned 6.13% vs 3.96% for CAFX. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FTCB charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for CAFX.
Performance
FTCB vs. CAFX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FTCB achieves a 0.36% return, which is significantly lower than CAFX's 0.43% return.
FTCB
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -0.02%
- YTD
- 0.36%
- 6M
- 0.52%
- 1Y
- 6.13%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CAFX
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- 0.33%
- YTD
- 0.43%
- 6M
- 0.63%
- 1Y
- 3.96%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FTCB vs. CAFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
FTCB First Trust Core Investment Grade ETF | 0.36% | 8.12% | -3.29% |
CAFX Congress Intermediate Bond ETF | 0.43% | 6.46% | -1.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between FTCB and CAFX is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 11, 2024 | 0.79 |
The correlation between FTCB and CAFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FTCB vs. CAFX — Risk / Return Rank
FTCB
CAFX
FTCB vs. CAFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Core Investment Grade ETF (FTCB) and Congress Intermediate Bond ETF (CAFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FTCB | CAFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.52 | 1.38 | +0.15 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.26 | 2.13 | +0.13 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.26 | +0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.91 | 2.20 | -0.29 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.99 | 6.46 | -0.47 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FTCB | CAFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.52 | 1.38 | +0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.27 | 0.94 | +0.33 |
Drawdowns
FTCB vs. CAFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FTCB drawdown since its inception was -4.99%, which is greater than CAFX's maximum drawdown of -2.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTCB and CAFX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FTCB | CAFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -4.99% | -2.63% | -2.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.04% | -1.79% | -1.25% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.53% | -0.78% | -0.75% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.26% | -0.73% | -0.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.97% | 0.61% | +0.36% |
Volatility
FTCB vs. CAFX - Volatility Comparison
First Trust Core Investment Grade ETF (FTCB) has a higher volatility of 1.36% compared to Congress Intermediate Bond ETF (CAFX) at 0.73%. This indicates that FTCB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CAFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FTCB | CAFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.36% | 0.73% | +0.63% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.92% | 1.85% | +1.07% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.05% | 2.88% | +1.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.20% | 3.16% | +2.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.20% | 3.16% | +2.04% |
FTCB vs. CAFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FTCB has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than CAFX's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
FTCB vs. CAFX - Dividend Comparison
FTCB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.30%, more than CAFX's 4.00% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CAFX Congress Intermediate Bond ETF | 4.00% | 3.92% | 0.96% | 0.00% |
FTCB First Trust Core Investment Grade ETF | 5.30% | 4.99% | 5.19% | 0.35% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FTCB and CAFX have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FTCB has higher volatility (1.36%) compared to CAFX (0.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTCB dropped -4.99% vs CAFX's -2.63%.
On 1-year performance, FTCB leads with 6.13% vs 3.96% for CAFX. On fees, CAFX is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, CAFX has been the lower-risk option at 0.73%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, FTCB has performed better with a 6.13% return vs 3.96%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CAFX is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for FTCB.
FTCB has the higher dividend yield at 5.30%, compared with 4.00% for CAFX.
They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Congress. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for FTCB and 0.35% for CAFX.
FTCB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.52 vs 1.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FTCB and CAFX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer