PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FTBFX vs. PCBAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FTBFX vs. PCBAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Total Bond Fund (FTBFX) and BlackRock Tactical Opportunities Fund (PCBAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FTBFX achieves a -0.19% return, which is significantly lower than PCBAX's 10.63% return. Over the past 10 years, FTBFX has underperformed PCBAX with an annualized return of 2.19%, while PCBAX has yielded a comparatively higher 5.82% annualized return.


FTBFX

1D
0.21%
1M
-1.00%
6M
-0.33%
YTD
-0.19%
1Y
2.23%
3Y*
4.66%
5Y*
0.14%
10Y*
2.19%
ALL TIME*
3.88%

PCBAX

1D
0.18%
1M
1.42%
6M
10.13%
YTD
10.63%
1Y
11.20%
3Y*
9.26%
5Y*
7.61%
10Y*
5.82%
ALL TIME*
6.31%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

FTBFX vs. PCBAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FTBFX
Fidelity Total Bond Fund
-0.19%7.50%2.13%7.25%-13.58%-0.44%9.34%9.89%-0.66%4.19%
PCBAX
BlackRock Tactical Opportunities Fund
10.63%6.16%11.77%2.37%5.77%0.29%6.50%1.41%4.32%7.71%

Correlation

The correlation between FTBFX and PCBAX is -0.28, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.28

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

-0.17

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

-0.19

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

-0.17

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 16, 2002

-0.14

The correlation between FTBFX and PCBAX shifts across timeframes, from -0.28 (1 year) to -0.14 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FTBFX vs. PCBAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FTBFX
FTBFX Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
FTBFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTBFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTBFX Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
FTBFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTBFX Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank

PCBAX
PCBAX Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
PCBAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PCBAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
PCBAX Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
PCBAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
PCBAX Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FTBFX vs. PCBAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Total Bond Fund (FTBFX) and BlackRock Tactical Opportunities Fund (PCBAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FTBFXPCBAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.38

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.39

-0.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.81

3.85

-3.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.04

9.17

-7.13

FTBFX vs. PCBAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FTBFX Sharpe Ratio is 0.64, which is lower than the PCBAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FTBFX and PCBAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FTBFX vs. PCBAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTBFX drawdown since its inception was -18.25%, smaller than the maximum PCBAX drawdown of -39.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTBFX and PCBAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FTBFXPCBAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.25%

-39.55%

+21.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.89%

-3.04%

+0.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.96%

-6.75%

+1.79%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.25%

-6.75%

-11.50%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.25%

-9.00%

-9.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.06%

0.00%

-2.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.31%

-4.35%

+2.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.15%

1.27%

-0.12%

Volatility

FTBFX vs. PCBAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Total Bond Fund (FTBFX) is 1.06%, while BlackRock Tactical Opportunities Fund (PCBAX) has a volatility of 1.63%. This indicates that FTBFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PCBAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FTBFXPCBAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.06%

1.63%

-0.57%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.00%

4.74%

-1.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.67%

5.80%

-2.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.68%

6.47%

-0.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.74%

6.10%

-1.36%

FTBFX vs. PCBAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FTBFX has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than PCBAX's 1.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

FTBFX vs. PCBAX - Dividend Comparison

FTBFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.40%, while PCBAX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FTBFX
Fidelity Total Bond Fund
4.40%4.36%4.15%4.15%2.54%1.89%5.22%3.03%3.19%2.97%3.61%3.30%
PCBAX
BlackRock Tactical Opportunities Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%11.67%3.36%0.00%2.44%3.08%9.91%0.80%1.41%4.86%

Frequently Asked Questions


FTBFX and PCBAX have a correlation of -0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PCBAX has higher volatility (1.63%) compared to FTBFX (1.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTBFX dropped -18.25% vs PCBAX's -39.55%.

PCBAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.02 vs 0.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FTBFX and PCBAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer