FTBFX vs. NPCT
FTBFX (Fidelity Total Bond Fund) and NPCT (Nuveen Core Plus Impact Fund) are both Intermediate Core-Plus Bond funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, FTBFX returned 0.14%/yr vs -3.34%/yr for NPCT. Their 0.51 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. FTBFX charges 0.45%/yr vs 5.08%/yr for NPCT.
Performance
FTBFX vs. NPCT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FTBFX achieves a -0.19% return, which is significantly lower than NPCT's 2.40% return.
FTBFX
- 1D
- 0.21%
- 1M
- -1.00%
- 6M
- -0.33%
- YTD
- -0.19%
- 1Y
- 2.23%
- 3Y*
- 4.66%
- 5Y*
- 0.14%
- 10Y*
- 2.19%
- ALL TIME*
- 3.88%
NPCT
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- -2.20%
- 6M
- -0.93%
- YTD
- 2.40%
- 1Y
- -0.36%
- 3Y*
- 11.85%
- 5Y*
- -3.34%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -3.16%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $1.12M | $1.18M | $1.22M |
FTBFX vs. NPCT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTBFX Fidelity Total Bond Fund | -0.19% | 7.50% | 2.13% | 7.25% | -13.58% | 2.00% |
NPCT Nuveen Core Plus Impact Fund | 2.40% | 9.87% | 17.23% | 7.78% | -37.50% | -4.98% |
Correlation
The correlation between FTBFX and NPCT is 0.52, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.52 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.50 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.53 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 28, 2021 | 0.51 |
The correlation between FTBFX and NPCT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.50 to 0.53 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FTBFX vs. NPCT — Risk / Return Rank
FTBFX
NPCT
FTBFX vs. NPCT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Total Bond Fund (FTBFX) and Nuveen Core Plus Impact Fund (NPCT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FTBFX | NPCT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.68 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.92 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 1.00 | +0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.81 | -0.05 | +0.86 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.04 | -0.11 | +2.15 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FTBFX vs. NPCT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FTBFX drawdown since its inception was -18.25%, smaller than the maximum NPCT drawdown of -46.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTBFX and NPCT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FTBFX | NPCT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.25% | -46.77% | +28.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.89% | -6.79% | +3.90% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.96% | -10.78% | +5.82% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.25% | -46.23% | +27.98% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -18.25% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.06% | -16.87% | +14.81% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.31% | -24.93% | +22.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.15% | 3.21% | -2.06% |
Volatility
FTBFX vs. NPCT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Total Bond Fund (FTBFX) is 1.06%, while Nuveen Core Plus Impact Fund (NPCT) has a volatility of 2.08%. This indicates that FTBFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NPCT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FTBFX | NPCT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.06% | 2.08% | -1.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.00% | 7.50% | -4.50% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.67% | 9.23% | -5.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.68% | 13.07% | -7.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.74% | 12.94% | -8.20% |
FTBFX vs. NPCT - Expense Ratio Comparison
FTBFX has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than NPCT's 5.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
FTBFX vs. NPCT - Dividend Comparison
FTBFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.40%, less than NPCT's 12.33% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTBFX Fidelity Total Bond Fund | 4.40% | 4.36% | 4.15% | 4.15% | 2.54% | 1.89% | 5.22% | 3.03% | 3.19% | 2.97% | 3.61% | 3.30% |
NPCT Nuveen Core Plus Impact Fund | 12.33% | 13.15% | 12.20% | 10.28% | 11.93% | 3.94% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FTBFX and NPCT have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NPCT has higher volatility (2.08%) compared to FTBFX (1.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTBFX dropped -18.25% vs NPCT's -46.77%.
FTBFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.64 vs -0.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FTBFX and NPCT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer