PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FTAL.L vs. PRY.MI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FTAL.L vs. PRY.MI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in SPDR FTSE UK All Share UCITS ETF (FTAL.L) and Prysmian SpA (PRY.MI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

FTAL.L is traded in GBP, while PRY.MI is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the PRY.MI values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FTAL.L achieves a 5.93% return, which is significantly lower than PRY.MI's 74.26% return. Over the past 10 years, FTAL.L has underperformed PRY.MI with an annualized return of 8.54%, while PRY.MI has yielded a comparatively higher 25.32% annualized return.


FTAL.L

1D
0.30%
1M
2.15%
YTD
5.93%
6M
8.27%
1Y
20.36%
3Y*
14.06%
5Y*
10.22%
10Y*
8.54%

PRY.MI

1D
-2.18%
1M
8.12%
YTD
74.26%
6M
77.82%
1Y
164.82%
3Y*
64.08%
5Y*
40.83%
10Y*
25.32%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FTAL.L vs. PRY.MI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FTAL.L
SPDR FTSE UK All Share UCITS ETF
5.93%23.19%9.03%7.92%0.55%17.18%-9.96%19.29%-9.71%12.99%
PRY.MI
Prysmian SpA
74.26%50.05%45.26%18.28%12.44%7.71%45.01%27.03%-33.77%18.18%

Correlation

The correlation between FTAL.L and PRY.MI is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.35

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.41

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.44

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 30, 2012

0.46

The correlation between FTAL.L and PRY.MI shifts across timeframes, from 0.35 (1 year) to 0.46 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FTAL.L vs. PRY.MI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FTAL.L
FTAL.L Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
FTAL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTAL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTAL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
FTAL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTAL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

PRY.MI
PRY.MI Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
PRY.MI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRY.MI Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRY.MI Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
PRY.MI Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRY.MI Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FTAL.L vs. PRY.MI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR FTSE UK All Share UCITS ETF (FTAL.L) and Prysmian SpA (PRY.MI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FTAL.LPRY.MIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.57

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.60

-0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.26

13.85

-11.58

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.66

34.75

-27.09

FTAL.L vs. PRY.MI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FTAL.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.87, which is lower than the PRY.MI Sharpe Ratio of 4.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FTAL.L and PRY.MI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FTAL.LPRY.MIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.87

4.44

-2.57

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

1.25

-0.44

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

0.77

-0.19

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.56

0.45

+0.12

Drawdowns

FTAL.L vs. PRY.MI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTAL.L drawdown since its inception was -35.26%, smaller than the maximum PRY.MI drawdown of -64.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTAL.L and PRY.MI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FTAL.LPRY.MIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.26%

-64.80%

+29.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.95%

-11.90%

+2.95%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.17%

-42.67%

+29.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.17%

-42.67%

+29.50%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.26%

-49.11%

+13.85%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.78%

-4.27%

+0.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.31%

-15.27%

+10.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.65%

4.74%

-2.09%

Volatility

FTAL.L vs. PRY.MI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR FTSE UK All Share UCITS ETF (FTAL.L) is 4.08%, while Prysmian SpA (PRY.MI) has a volatility of 14.10%. This indicates that FTAL.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PRY.MI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FTAL.LPRY.MIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.08%

14.10%

-10.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.45%

29.52%

-20.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.84%

37.19%

-26.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.68%

32.42%

-19.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.75%

32.57%

-17.82%

Dividends

FTAL.L vs. PRY.MI - Dividend Comparison

FTAL.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PRY.MI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.60%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FTAL.L
SPDR FTSE UK All Share UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PRY.MI
Prysmian SpA
0.60%0.93%1.14%1.46%1.59%1.51%0.86%4.00%2.46%1.58%1.72%2.07%

Frequently Asked Questions


FTAL.L and PRY.MI have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FTAL.L and PRY.MI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer