FTAL.L vs. MVEU.L
FTAL.L (SPDR FTSE UK All Share UCITS ETF) and MVEU.L (iShares Edge MSCI Europe Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)) are both Europe Equities funds - FTAL.L tracks the FTSE AllSh TR GBP while MVEU.L tracks the MSCI Europe NR EUR. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FTAL.L returned 8.17%/yr vs 7.02%/yr for MVEU.L. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FTAL.L charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for MVEU.L.
Performance
FTAL.L vs. MVEU.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
FTAL.L is traded in GBP, while MVEU.L is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the MVEU.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FTAL.L achieves a 8.11% return, which is significantly higher than MVEU.L's 5.74% return. Over the past 10 years, FTAL.L has outperformed MVEU.L with an annualized return of 8.17%, while MVEU.L has yielded a comparatively lower 7.02% annualized return.
FTAL.L
- 1D
- 0.49%
- 1M
- 0.76%
- 6M
- 4.78%
- YTD
- 8.11%
- 1Y
- 20.62%
- 3Y*
- 15.81%
- 5Y*
- 10.86%
- 10Y*
- 8.17%
MVEU.L
- 1D
- 0.29%
- 1M
- -0.32%
- 6M
- 4.09%
- YTD
- 5.74%
- 1Y
- 9.09%
- 3Y*
- 11.46%
- 5Y*
- 6.80%
- 10Y*
- 7.02%
FTAL.L vs. MVEU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTAL.L SPDR FTSE UK All Share UCITS ETF | 8.11% | 23.19% | 9.03% | 7.92% | 0.55% | 17.18% | -9.96% | 19.28% | -9.70% | 12.98% |
MVEU.L iShares Edge MSCI Europe Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) | 5.74% | 17.63% | 6.71% | 8.45% | -8.16% | 14.46% | 1.57% | 15.47% | -2.87% | 14.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between FTAL.L and MVEU.L is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 30, 2012 | 0.74 |
The correlation between FTAL.L and MVEU.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.
FTAL.L vs. MVEU.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FTAL.L
MVEU.L
Financial Services
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
Utilities
Communication Services
Technology
Real Estate
Financial Services
FTAL.L
MVEU.L
Industrials
FTAL.L
MVEU.L
Healthcare
FTAL.L
MVEU.L
Consumer Defensive
FTAL.L
MVEU.L
Energy
FTAL.L
MVEU.L
Basic Materials
FTAL.L
MVEU.L
Consumer Cyclical
FTAL.L
MVEU.L
Utilities
FTAL.L
MVEU.L
Communication Services
FTAL.L
MVEU.L
Technology
FTAL.L
MVEU.L
Real Estate
FTAL.L
MVEU.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FTAL.L vs. MVEU.L — Risk / Return Rank
FTAL.L
MVEU.L
FTAL.L vs. MVEU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR FTSE UK All Share UCITS ETF (FTAL.L) and iShares Edge MSCI Europe Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (MVEU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FTAL.L | MVEU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.84 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.19 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.18 | +0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.29 | 1.09 | +1.20 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.27 | 3.09 | +4.17 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FTAL.L vs. MVEU.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FTAL.L drawdown since its inception was -35.26%, which is greater than MVEU.L's maximum drawdown of -23.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTAL.L and MVEU.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FTAL.L | MVEU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.26% | -23.74% | -11.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.95% | -8.32% | -0.63% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.17% | -8.32% | -4.85% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -13.17% | -17.42% | +4.25% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.26% | -23.74% | -11.52% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.79% | -3.68% | +1.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.25% | -3.52% | -0.73% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.83% | 2.93% | -0.10% |
Volatility
FTAL.L vs. MVEU.L - Volatility Comparison
SPDR FTSE UK All Share UCITS ETF (FTAL.L) has a higher volatility of 2.91% compared to iShares Edge MSCI Europe Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (MVEU.L) at 2.73%. This indicates that FTAL.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MVEU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FTAL.L | MVEU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.91% | 2.73% | +0.18% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.77% | 7.66% | +2.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.22% | 9.14% | +2.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.72% | 11.30% | +1.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.51% | 12.55% | +1.96% |
FTAL.L vs. MVEU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
FTAL.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than MVEU.L's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
FTAL.L vs. MVEU.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither FTAL.L nor MVEU.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
FTAL.L and MVEU.L have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FTAL.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FTAL.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for MVEU.L.
FTAL.L tracks FTSE AllSh TR GBP, while MVEU.L tracks MSCI Europe NR EUR. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for FTAL.L and 0.25% for MVEU.L.
Find the right allocation for FTAL.L and MVEU.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer