PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
FTAL.L vs. MIDD.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

FTAL.L vs. MIDD.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

FTAL.L (SPDR FTSE UK All Share UCITS ETF) and MIDD.L (iShares FTSE 250 UCITS ETF) are both Europe Equities funds - FTAL.L tracks the FTSE AllSh TR GBP while MIDD.L tracks the FTSE 250 Ex Investment Trust TR GBP. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FTAL.L returned 8.54%/yr vs 5.54%/yr for MIDD.L. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FTAL.L charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for MIDD.L.

Performance

FTAL.L vs. MIDD.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in SPDR FTSE UK All Share UCITS ETF (FTAL.L) and iShares FTSE 250 UCITS ETF (MIDD.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

FTAL.L is traded in GBP, while MIDD.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the MIDD.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FTAL.L achieves a 5.93% return, which is significantly higher than MIDD.L's 5.26% return. Over the past 10 years, FTAL.L has outperformed MIDD.L with an annualized return of 8.54%, while MIDD.L has yielded a comparatively lower 5.54% annualized return.

FTAL.L

1D
0.30%
1M
2.15%
YTD
5.93%
6M
8.27%
1Y
20.36%
3Y*
14.06%
5Y*
10.22%
10Y*
8.54%

MIDD.L

1D
0.56%
1M
4.32%
YTD
5.26%
6M
7.17%
1Y
13.79%
3Y*
9.96%
5Y*
3.14%
10Y*
5.54%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FTAL.L vs. MIDD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FTAL.L
SPDR FTSE UK All Share UCITS ETF		5.93%23.19%9.03%7.92%0.55%17.18%-9.96%19.29%-9.71%12.99%
MIDD.L
iShares FTSE 250 UCITS ETF		5.26%12.44%7.33%7.76%-17.86%16.27%-5.34%28.46%-13.44%17.34%

Correlation

The correlation between FTAL.L and MIDD.L is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.75

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.77

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 30, 2012

0.76

The correlation between FTAL.L and MIDD.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.

FTAL.L vs. MIDD.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
FTAL.L
MIDD.L

Financial Services

24.2%
19.5%

Industrials

14.5%
19.9%

Healthcare

12.8%
4.4%

Consumer Defensive

12.1%
6.1%

Energy

10.9%
2.5%

Basic Materials

8.4%
6.6%

Consumer Cyclical

5.6%
13.3%

Utilities

5.1%
3.0%

Communication Services

3.0%
5.9%

Real Estate

1.7%
9.4%

Technology

1.7%
9.2%

Financial Services

FTAL.L
24.2%
MIDD.L
19.5%

Industrials

FTAL.L
14.5%
MIDD.L
19.9%

Healthcare

FTAL.L
12.8%
MIDD.L
4.4%

Consumer Defensive

FTAL.L
12.1%
MIDD.L
6.1%

Energy

FTAL.L
10.9%
MIDD.L
2.5%

Basic Materials

FTAL.L
8.4%
MIDD.L
6.6%

Consumer Cyclical

FTAL.L
5.6%
MIDD.L
13.3%

Utilities

FTAL.L
5.1%
MIDD.L
3.0%

Communication Services

FTAL.L
3.0%
MIDD.L
5.9%

Real Estate

FTAL.L
1.7%
MIDD.L
9.4%

Technology

FTAL.L
1.7%
MIDD.L
9.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

SPDR FTSE UK All Share UCITS ETF

iShares FTSE 250 UCITS ETF

Often compared with FTAL.L:
FTAL.L vs. CUKX.LFTAL.L vs. VUKG.LFTAL.L vs. EUEA.ASFTAL.L vs. NG.LFTAL.L vs. REL.LFTAL.L vs. LWDB.LFTAL.L vs. GBPG.L
Often compared with MIDD.L:
MIDD.L vs. VMID.LMIDD.L vs. CSUK.LMIDD.L vs. CUKS.LMIDD.L vs. ISF.LMIDD.L vs. HMWO.LMIDD.L vs. SWDA.LMIDD.L vs. SPY

Return for Risk

FTAL.L vs. MIDD.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
FTAL.L
FTAL.L Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
FTAL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTAL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTAL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
FTAL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTAL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
MIDD.L
MIDD.L Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
MIDD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MIDD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
MIDD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
MIDD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
MIDD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FTAL.L vs. MIDD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR FTSE UK All Share UCITS ETF (FTAL.L) and iShares FTSE 250 UCITS ETF (MIDD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

FTAL.LMIDD.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.87
1.10

+0.77

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
2.66
1.67

+0.99

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.21

+0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.26

1.19

+1.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.66

4.19

+3.47

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FTAL.L vs. MIDD.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FTAL.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.87, which is higher than the MIDD.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FTAL.L and MIDD.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

FTAL.LMIDD.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.87

1.10

+0.77

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

0.21

+0.60

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

0.33

+0.24

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.56

0.48

+0.08

Drawdowns

FTAL.L vs. MIDD.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTAL.L drawdown since its inception was -35.26%, smaller than the maximum MIDD.L drawdown of -51.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTAL.L and MIDD.L.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

FTAL.LMIDD.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.26%

-51.66%

+16.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.95%

-11.54%

+2.59%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.17%

-16.92%

+3.75%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.17%

-29.93%

+16.76%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.26%

-41.60%

+6.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.78%

-0.77%

-3.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.31%

-8.76%

+4.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.65%

3.28%

-0.63%

Volatility

FTAL.L vs. MIDD.L - Volatility Comparison

SPDR FTSE UK All Share UCITS ETF (FTAL.L) and iShares FTSE 250 UCITS ETF (MIDD.L) have volatilities of 4.08% and 3.92%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

FTAL.LMIDD.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.08%

3.92%

+0.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.45%

10.27%

-0.82%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.84%

12.49%

-1.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.68%

15.27%

-2.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.75%

16.54%

-1.79%

FTAL.L vs. MIDD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

FTAL.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than MIDD.L's 0.40% expense ratio.

Dividends

FTAL.L vs. MIDD.L - Dividend Comparison

FTAL.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MIDD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.43%.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FTAL.L
SPDR FTSE UK All Share UCITS ETF		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MIDD.L
iShares FTSE 250 UCITS ETF		3.43%3.56%3.05%3.17%2.76%2.01%1.51%2.72%3.07%2.80%2.67%2.80%

Frequently Asked Questions

FTAL.L and MIDD.L have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, FTAL.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FTAL.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for MIDD.L.

FTAL.L tracks FTSE AllSh TR GBP, while MIDD.L tracks FTSE 250 Ex Investment Trust TR GBP. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for FTAL.L and 0.40% for MIDD.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FTAL.L and MIDD.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer